Arabic English French Persian
Is Islam Misunderstood?


According to a Pew Research Center study published in 2009, public perceptions depend heavily on a few key factors. Pew’s Gregory Smith explained: “One of the most powerful factors shaping views of Islam is education,” he said. “Those Americans who have more education tend to be more favorable toward Muslim Americans and Islam than Americans with less education. Interestingly, age was also a good predictor of views of Muslim Americans and Islam, with young people tend to be more favorable than were older people.”

Decades ago, Professor Marshall McLuhan observed, “The medium is the message.” As the print and electronic media enter more and more into every aspect of life, their influence increases greatly in shaping the views, deeds and behavior of the public. The power of the media is a mixed blessing. On the one hand, it can serve to expose injustices, wrongdoings, and flaws. On the other, it is able to propagate misinformation and outright disinformation and fake news. Manipulation and control of the media is of critical importance to the rule of totalitarian states. Free societies, although less subject to laundered information, are still at considerable risk of being selectively informed or misinformed outright. The public can be deceived more easily by the overlords of the media when political correctness is used as subterfuge for promotion of certain ideas.

A case in point is the media’s portrayal of Islam, articulated by politicians and pundits — the talking heads on television and radio, as well as the analysts who write for newspapers and magazines. Time and again we hear and read that Islam is a religion of peace, in spite of the fact Islam has been a religion of violence from its inception to the present. This mantra, “Islam is a religion of peace” is repeated so often that it has become an indisputable statement of fact in the minds of many. Former President George W. Bush on several occasions repeated the mantra and attributed the horrific violence committed under the banner of Islam to a small band of extremists. The President’s assertion was either based on ignorance of the facts about Islam or was an attempt at political correctness. Perhaps the President’s reticence to speak on the true nature of Islam was due to his desire to avoid inflaming the already charged feelings of many about Islam. In any event, truth was and is sacrificed, and the public continues to be fed the false notion that Islam is a peaceful religion.

People who dare to disclose the true nature of Islam run the risk of being castigated as bigots and hatemongers. Yet even a cursory examination of Islam’s history and Islamic texts conclusively proves the exact opposite of peacefulness. Islam was and continues to be a movement of unbridled violence. Islam was forced upon every people at the point of the sword and the imposition of backbreaking jaziyah (poll taxes) levied on those who were spared death and allowed to retain their religious beliefs. In addition to paying heavy jaziyah, the non-Muslims were treated, at best, as second class in their own homelands.

The abominable persecution of non-Muslims in Islamic countries is a standard operating procedure. In many Islamic countries, non-Muslim marriages are not recognized as legal unions, and the children of such couples are stigmatized as bastards. Never mind the fact that Saudi Arabia, the cradle of barbarism, and even Egypt, the more civilized Islamic country and recipient of billions of dollars in U.S. aid, treat non-Muslims as second class and deprive them of their legitimate human rights. The pundits, the analysts and the politicians are doing a great disservice to the public, each for its own expedient reasons, by parroting the mantra regarding the peaceful nature of Islam. In reality, the so-called small band of Islamic extremists is the true face of Islam.

Admittedly, from time to time and place to place, Muslims have shown a degree of tolerance for the non-Muslims. This tolerance dates back to the very early years of Muhammad himself. Early on, Muhammad proclaimed, “For you, your religion, and for me, my religion.” This assertion lasted but a few years, until Muhammad’s movement gathered strength and Islam became the only alternative to death or heavy taxation. The imposition of jaziyah was a clever ploy for filling the Islamic coffers to support its armies and to finance its further conquests.

A longstanding Islamic practice is to appear to be meek while weak and to assume despotic intolerant power when strong. The recent migration of Muslims to non-Islamic lands began as a seemingly harmless, even useful, trickle of cheap and much-needed labor. Before long, greater and greater numbers of Muslims deluged the new territories, and as they grew in numbers — by means of a high birth rate as well as new arrivals — Muslims began reverting to their intolerant ways, demanding legal status for Sharia (Islamic law), the draconian laws that resemble the laws of humanity’s barbaric past.

Islam is indeed misrepresented. But Islam is not misrepresented by its “detractors.” It is misrepresented by Islamic mercenaries: organizations and individuals generously funded by states as well as wealthy believers, who are making billions of dollars pumping and selling oil at astronomical prices. Prestigious universities in the West, always looking for handouts, are tripping over one another to establish Islamic studies programs staffed by professors who sing the praises of Islam. Newspapers are routinely intimidated by complaints by Islamic associations if they dare to print the truth about Islam. Legions of lawyers, Muslims as well as hired guns, are on the lookout to intimidate and silence any voice speaking the truth about Islam.

The media that falls in line may receive generous advertising revenue and other incentives from Islamic lobbyists. Hence it is a fact that Islam is misunderstood. It is both misunderstood and misrepresented very effectively by non-Muslim individuals and institutions who are generously rewarded by the modern-day Islamic conquerors. This time around, the Muslims are using the  petrodollars they extract from oil-addicted non-Muslims. The sword is temporarily replaced by just as deadly a weapon — the petrodollar. Before long, the Muslims aim to add a deadlier modern version of the sword — the Islamic bomb. With the bomb in one hand and the other hand on the oil spigot, the Muslims hope to bring the non-Muslim world to its knees before the religion of peace and brotherhood.

Satan of the Quran is a pious Jenni who was forced into wickedness by Allah Seduction

Islam is not Abrahamic religion and Quran contradicts the Torah Part 2


Satan of the Quran is a pious Jenni who was forced into wickedness by Allah Seduction


Part 1 we proved that Adam of the Quran is not the same Adam the Torah talked about, here is the linked if you missed that article


Now in regards to Satan between Quran on one side and Tanakh (all OT books include Torah) on the other, we find that Satan can not be the same creature or being between the both.


Satan of the Torah is a Fallen Angel

Based on OT we can easily conclude that Satan currently is a fallen angel based on Isaiah 14 and Ezekiel 28, he was created as a righteous archangel named Lucifer but at a point of time before creation of mankind he started to remove his sight from the righteousness, holiness and greatness of God into his own, the spiritual disease of self-righteousness and that is why the accumulative doctrine of true righteousness in the bible is God’s righteousness covering us not our own and that is the bases of salvation. Now back to Satan self-righteousness, greed and arrogance started to creep into him until the point he rebellion against God and we see that clearly in the following scripture

Isaiah 14:12

How you are fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! How you are cut down to the ground, you who weakened the nations!


So as you see Satan was created as good, why would a kind and good God create an evil spirit?

But self-righteousness and greed made it’s way into him no one and specially God motivated him into wickedness

After he has fallen and became in rebellion with God he became the accuser against mankind, his plan is to separate between mankind and God (and that leads to hell), refer to book of Job and Zechariah (3:1-2)


Also in the bible we know more about Satan

Revelation 12:9

The great dragon was hurled down—that ancient serpent called the devil, or Satan, who leads the whole world astray. He was hurled to the earth, and his angels with him


Also Jesus Christ described him as the liar and from the beginning murderer of mankind,

for example John 8:44

You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.


Also in Judeo-christian worldview angels either good or fallen are not physical beings but spiritual beings created as servants for mankind according to Hebrews 1:14

Are not all angels ministering spirits sent to serve those who will inherit salvation?


Satan of the Quran is a Jinni

Satan of the Quran is not a fallen angel, actually not angel at all but a physical mythical creature made of fire and is one of the Jinn based on those ayahs

Surah 18:50

And [mention] when We said to the angels, "Prostrate to Adam," and they prostrated, except for Iblees. He was of the jinn and departed from the command of his Lord (Sahih international)


So explicitly the Quran says that Satan origin is not an angel but from the Jinn, and by that we know that God of the Torah is not the same God of the Quran, simply the story tellers are not the same!

So what is the nature of the Jinn in the quran? According to Quran are those spiritual beings or physical beings? The answer are in the following ayahs

Surah 15:27

And the jinn We created before from scorching fire

Surah 55:15

And He created the jinn from a smokeless flame of fire.


So according to Quran Satan who is from the Jinn is not a spiritual being like the Torah but a physical being who is made of smokeless flame of fire! Not the same being, again the storyteller of the Torah is not the same storyteller of Quran, Yahweh is not Allah!


Satan is a TAWHID martyr

Sufi Muslims believe that Satan is the Imam and martyr of TAWHID, because Allah commanded him to prostrate to Adam but he refused and insisted on TAWHID and that is he fall from Allah grace, if you don’t believe me this is islamic reference in Arabic go ask you Muslim cleric who knows arabic and show him the following link


So according to Quran Allah commanded that Satan prostrate to Adam but Satan refused, we find that in the following Ayahs

Surah 38:71-74

“When thy Lord said unto the angels: Lo! I am about to create a mortal out of mire, (71) And when I have fashioned him and breathed into him of My Spirit, then fall down before him prostrate, (72) The angels fell down prostrate, every one, (73) Saving Iblis; he was scornful and became one of the disbelievers.”

Surah 2:34

“And when We said unto the angels: Prostrate yourselves before Adam, they fell prostrate, all save Iblis. He demurred through pride, and so became a disbeliever.”

Surah 15:28-33

“And (remember) when thy Lord said unto the angels: Lo! I am creating a mortal out of potter's clay of black mud altered, (28) So, when I have made him and have breathed into him of My Spirit, do ye fall down, prostrating yourselves unto him. (29) So the angels fell prostrate, all of them together (30) Save Iblis. He refused to be among the prostrate. (31) He said: O Iblis! What aileth thee that thou art not among the prostrate? (32) He said: I am not going to prostrate myself unto a mortal whom Thou hast created out of potter's clay of black mud altered!”


And also refer to ayahs 16:71, 18:50 and 20:116-117

We also notice a big confusion in those Ayahs as following

First: The commandment to prostrate was to all angels, it says “all angles except Satan” so why Satan found himself obliged to prostrate? Remember Satan is not from the angels, Satan is from the Jinn, why would Allah punish him for not doing so? The commandment was to the angels not to the Jinn, or the Quran forgot that Satan is not an angel but Jinn???

A big discrepancy in the Quran and as we know according to Surah 4:82 that makes Quran not from God or Allah

Second: Why would Allah command Satan to commit Shirk???


Seems to me Satan is TAWHID martyr that was pushed into wickedness by Allah, that is why Quranic Satan is claiming that Allah seduced him into wickedness as we will see in the next section


Satan was seduced into wickedness by Allah

Yes Satan said to Allah you seduced me and Allah did not falsify that!

We will present to you the ayah in context so nobody falsely accuse us of taking ayah out of context that is why we will start from Surah 7:10

Surah 7:10-18

And assuredly We established you in the earth and appointed for you livelihoods therein; yet little thanks ye return. (10) And assuredly We created you, thereafter We fashioned you, and thereafter We said to the angels: prostrate yourselves before Adam; then they fell prostrate; not so Iblis: he was not of those who fell prostrate. (11) Allah said: what prevented thee, that thou shouldst not prostrate thyself, when I bade thee? He said. I am better than he; me Thou createdest me from fire, and him Thou createdest from clay. (12) Allah said: then get thee down from hence; not for thee is it to be stiff-necked herein. So go thou forth; verily thou art of the abject ones. (13) He said: respite me till the Day they shall be raised up. (14) Allah said: verily thou art of the respited. (15) He said (Satan): because Thou hast seduced me, I will beset for them Thy straight path. (16) Then surely I will come upon them from before them and from behind them and from their right and from their left, and Thou shalt not find the most of them thankful. (17) Allah said: go thou forth from hence, scorned, driven away. Whosoever of them followeth thee, I will of a surety fill Hell with you all. (Eng-Abdul Daryabadi)


In context and without doing any bad exegesis, based on the commandment to prostrate to Adam, Satan accused Allah of seducing him into disobedience and Allah did not falsify that


So how is that Quranic scandal not that obvious to Muslims? Because they have twisted away from the true meaning in the different english translations of the Quran

For example Sahih international replaced “Seduce me” with “put me in error”! Meanwhile we find in arabic  that the word “غوى” or “Ghawa” means Seduce, intentionally deceive, mislead and lured

Also another Ayah concurs the same

Surah 15:39

He said (Satan), “My Lord, since You made me go astray (actually it the same arabic word “Ghawa” meaning seduced), I swear that I shall beautify for them (evils) on the earth, and shall lead all of them astray,


As we see Satan of Quran is pious Jinn made of flames who have been seduced into disobedience by Allah of Islam, definitely not the true Satan that we know according to Torah and bible


Islam is not an Abrahamic religion


To be continued ..



Satan and the Origin of Evil


Satan according to Islam


Arabic articles


Related Articles

The islamic bigotry and hateful speech toward the Jews


Quran is Satan Agenda to slaughter mankind

Woman in Islam is equal to a goat


Women in Islam part 3,

Woman in Islam is equal to a goat


Part 2 in series of articles about women in Islam, we proved that women status is worse that toilets, if you missed to read that following is the link

In this article we will show you islamic resources that talked about women as being a goat


Ewe or Wife?

Quran is talking about 2 brothers came to king David in a conflict about ewes (or nanny goats), we find that in


Surah 38:23

Indeed this, my brother, has ninety-nine ewes, and I have one ewe; so he said, 'Entrust her to me,' and he overpowered me in speech (Sahih international)


But are they really talking about goats or women?? Notice that the ewe was referred to by using “her” as the ayah says “Entrust her to me” meanwhile if it is just an animal it should have said “Entrust it to me”


Some one could say the “Sahih international” english translation had a mistake but what about Abdul Rahman Youssef Ali??


his man is my brother; He has nine and ninety ewes, and I have (but) one: Yet he says `Commit her to my care' and is (moreover) harsh to me in speech. (Yusuf Ali)


Same thing did not use “it” but instead used “her”


But how did the scholars interpret 38:23? All major TAFSIR concurred that ewes in that ayah refers to wives!


Tanwîr al-Miqbâs min Tafsîr Ibn ‘Abbâs



The arabians calls women “goats”!

That literally had been said in major Tafasir, the arab refer to women as goats


Tafsir Al Baghawy for Q38:23

So one of them said, “this is my brother” meaning following my same way and religion, “has 99 ewes” meaning women “and I have one” meaning one woman or one wife and the arabs use “goat” as a metaphor to refer to a women


Arabic reference:



Women are ridden like the cow and camel

We find that in Tafsir Al Qurtubi


Tafsir Al Qurtubi for Q38:23

The Arab symbolizes women using goat or sheep because of them being weak and meek and can also be symbolized as cow or camel because all of those are ridden by men


Arabic reference


{23} إِنَّ هَذَا أَخِي لَهُ تِسْعٌ وَتِسْعُونَ نَعْجَةً وَلِيَ نَعْجَةٌ وَاحِدَةٌ فَقَالَ أَكْفِلْنِيهَا وَعَزَّنِي فِي الْخِطَابِ

أَيْ قَالَ الْمَلَك الَّذِي تَكَلَّمَ عَنْ أوريا " إِنَّ هَذَا أَخِي " أَيْ عَلَى دِينِي , وَأَشَارَ إِلَى الْمُدَّعَى عَلَيْهِ . وَقِيلَ : أَخِي أَيْ صَاحِبِي . " لَهُ تِسْع وَتِسْعُونَ نَعْجَة " وَقَرَأَ الْحَسَن : " تَسْعٌ وَتَسْعُونَ نَعْجَة " بِفَتْحِ التَّاء فِيهِمَا وَهِيَ لُغَة شَاذَّة , وَهِيَ الصَّحِيحَة مِنْ قِرَاءَة الْحَسَن ; قَالَ النَّحَّاس . وَالْعَرَب تُكَنِّي عَنْ الْمَرْأَة بِالنَّعْجَةِ وَالشَّاة ; لِمَا هِيَ عَلَيْهِ مِنْ السُّكُون وَالْمَعْجِزَة وَضَعْف الْجَانِب . وَقَدْ يُكَنَّى عَنْهَا بِالْبَقَرَةِ وَالْحُجْرَة وَالنَّاقَة ; لِأَنَّ الْكُلّ مَرْكُوب .


Congratulations to Muslima women on her being honored by islam, as you see according to scholars since men rides you as they ride animals like camels you are considered herds of cattles


Also as we saw from a qur'anic point of view you are equal to a goat

Discriminative Islam part 1, Quran Says Mushriks are filthy

Discriminative Islam part 1

Quran Says Mushriks are filthy


Who are considered Mushrik from Islamic perspectives?

Mushrik simply mean polytheists who associates partners with Allah or God. And from Islamic perspectives, Hindu, Buddhists, Christians, virtually all religions and even Jews are Mushriks based on

Surah 9:30

The Jews say, "Ezra is the son of Allah "; and the Christians say, "The Messiah is the son of Allah ." That is their statement from their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved [before them]. May Allah destroy them; how are they deluded?


So Jews said Ezra is son of Allah and Christians says Messiah is son of Allah and hence they disbelieved and became Mushriks, and you notice in this ayah that Allah says “may Allah destroy them” which is puzzling, because I would say to this Allah one of three things:

1- To this unknown speaker who is saying “may Allah destroy them” then who are you who is talking??????

2- Again to whom supposed to be Allah and is saying “may Allah destroy them” if this is what you see just and according to your will, for example the Christians who is saying “Messiah is the Son of Allah” what is holding you back from destroying them??? Why aren’t the muslim executing your will according to the other ayahs in Surah 9 for examples that commands to kill all the Mushriks????

3- Are there two Allah in this ayah? Allah who wants the Jews and Christians destroyed and another Allah who really can destroy them???


Racist Islam in Q9:28

We find in Surah Al Tawbah 9:28

O you who have believed, indeed the polytheists are unclean, so let them not approach al-Masjid al-Haram after this, their [final] year. And if you fear privation, Allah will enrich you from His bounty if He wills. Indeed, Allah is Knowing and Wise (Sahih International)


And the arabic used for “unclean” is “NAGGAS” which simply means defiled, you will find that more clear in another english translations as following examples


O Ye who believe! the associators are simply filthy; so let them not approach the Sacred Mosque after this their year (Eng-Abdul Daryabadi)


O you who believe (in Allâh's Oneness and in His Messenger (Muhammad SAW)! Verily, the Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allâh, and in the Message of Muhammad SAW) are Najasun (impure) (Dr Mohsin)


O you who believe, the Mushriks are impure indeed, so let them not approach Al-Masjid-ul-Haram after this year (Taqi Usmani)


Tanwîr al-Miqbâs min Tafsîr Ibn ‘Abbâs for Q9:28

(O ye who believe! The idolaters only are unclean) impure. (So let them not come near the Inviolable Place of Worship) for pilgrimage and circumambulation (after this their year) the year of freedom from obligation (bara'ah) after the day of immolation. (If ye fear poverty) impoverishment and neediness (Allah shall preserve you of His bounty) of His provision in another way (if He will) when He wills and will make you dispense with trading with Bakr Ibn Wa'il. (Lo! Allah is Knower) of your sustenance, (Wise) in that which He has ordained for you.


Tafsir Ibn Kathir for Q9:28

O you who believe! Verily, the Mushrikin are impure. So let them not come near Al-Masjid Al-Haram after this year;

Allah commands His believing servants, who are pure in religion and person, to expel the idolaters who are filthy in the religious sense, from Al-Masjid Al-Haram ....


Confirming that since the  MUSHRIKs are not Muslims they are filthy, and even if you falsified Ibn Kathir tafsir that is explicit and direct in the ayah itself, is not that racism, so a group of people because of their religion are filthy???


Tafsir al-Jalalayn for Q9:28

O you who believe the idolaters are indeed unclean they are filth on account of their inner vileness so do not let them come near the Sacred Mosque that is let them not enter the Sanctuary after this year of theirs year 9 of the Hijra. If you fear impoverishment poverty as a result of the cessation of their commerce with you God will surely enrich you from His bounty if He will and He indeed enriched them through conquests and the imposition of the jizya. God is Knowing Wise.


Consequences of racist Islam on the other

And we see consequences of demeaning non-muslims as religiously impure, expel them out of their homes, this place became holy land!

And that is why in Saudi Arabia any non-Muslim are prevented from entering the two holy cities of Islam Mecca and Madina


We also notice that the Quran commits “ad-hominem” fallacy against group of people that are currently 80% of the world population, instead of exposing the doctrine of Mushriks fallacies he went to demean those who follow that doctrine.


Now what is the Muslims obligations after knowing that non-muslims are impure and cause filthiness in Islamic lands??

Read the related articles


To be continued ..


Related Articles:

-The Muslim who never invade nor thought about it is not a true Muslim (Hadith Sahih)


-The Quran generic commandments to subjugate the whole world to Islam using the sword

The Quran generic commandments to subjugate the whole world to Islam using the sword


Muhammadian wars was offensive not defensive part 3


The Quran generic commandments to subjugate the whole world to Islam using the sword


Part 2 of this article we saw that it is obligatory for the Muslims to invade and this is the link for Part 2


Please remember that when comparing between two different worldviews typically Islam versus Christianity we are comparing the generic commandments that followers of this religion today are obliged to follow, we are not comparing circumstantial directives and that what confuses the Muslim when he qoute from Old testament because he is not quoting generic commandments but circumstantial directives. And that is totally different from the general evil commandments that we will present now from the Quran


Islam prohibits peace with the enemy if weaker

Surah Muhammad 47:35

فَلَا تَهِنُواْ وَتَدۡعُوٓاْ إِلَى ٱلسَّلۡمِ وَأَنتُمُ ٱلۡأَعۡلَوۡنَ وَٱللَّهُ مَعَكُمۡ وَلَن يَتِرَكُمۡ أَعۡمَـٰلَكُمۡ

So do not weaken and call for peace while you are superior; and Allah is with you and will never deprive you of [the reward of] your deeds. (Sahih international)

We saw in part 1 that this Ayah abrogated Surah 8:61 for more about that refer to the linked article


Surah Al Tawba 9:111

إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ ٱشۡتَرَىٰ مِنَ ٱلۡمُؤۡمِنِينَ أَنفُسَهُمۡ وَأَمۡوَٲلَهُم بِأَنَّ لَهُمُ ٱلۡجَنَّةَ‌ۚ يُقَـٰتِلُونَ فِى سَبِيلِ ٱللَّهِ فَيَقۡتُلُونَ وَيُقۡتَلُونَ‌ۖ

Indeed, Allah has purchased from the believers their lives and their properties [in exchange] for that they will have Paradise. They fight in the cause of Allah , so they kill and are killed.

So Muslims Allah slaved you only for one purpose to slaughter the infidel!



Muslims must be harsh and non-smiling to the unbelievers

Surah Al Fath 48:29

مُّحَمَّدٌ۬ رَّسُولُ ٱللَّهِ‌ۚ وَٱلَّذِينَ مَعَهُ ۥۤ أَشِدَّآءُ عَلَى ٱلۡكُفَّارِ رُحَمَآءُ بَيۡنَہُمۡ‌ۖ تَرَٮٰهُمۡ رُكَّعً۬ا سُجَّدً۬ا يَبۡتَغُونَ فَضۡلاً۬ مِّنَ ٱللَّهِ وَرِضۡوَٲنً۬ا‌ۖ سِيمَاهُمۡ فِى وُجُوهِهِم مِّنۡ أَثَرِ ٱلسُّجُودِ‌ۚ ذَٲلِكَ مَثَلُهُمۡ فِى ٱلتَّوۡرَٮٰةِ‌ۚ وَمَثَلُهُمۡ فِى ٱلۡإِنجِيلِ كَزَرۡعٍ أَخۡرَجَ شَطۡـَٔهُ ۥ فَـَٔازَرَهُ ۥ فَٱسۡتَغۡلَظَ فَٱسۡتَوَىٰ عَلَىٰ سُوقِهِۦ يُعۡجِبُ ٱلزُّرَّاعَ لِيَغِيظَ بِہِمُ ٱلۡكُفَّارَ‌ۗ وَعَدَ ٱللَّهُ ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُواْ وَعَمِلُواْ ٱلصَّـٰلِحَـٰتِ مِنۡہُم مَّغۡفِرَةً۬ وَأَجۡرًا عَظِيمَۢا


Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah ; and those with him are forceful against the disbelievers, merciful among themselves. You see them bowing and prostrating [in prayer], seeking bounty from Allah and [His] pleasure. Their mark is on their faces from the trace of prostration. That is their description in the Torah. And their description in the Gospel is as a plant which produces its offshoots and strengthens them so they grow firm and stand upon their stalks, delighting the sowers - so that Allah may enrage by them the disbelievers. Allah has promised those who believe and do righteous deeds among them forgiveness and a great reward. (Sahih international)

So this Ayah explicitly admits that Muhammad and his followers are forceful against the disbelievers. If you forced someone to submit to your God, is this considered an invitation for mankind to love your God or hate him???? Doesn't  that make the Quran an invitation for the disbelievers to hate God?????

Let us for example check a portion of Tafsir for this ayah


Tafsir Ibn Kathir for Surah 48:29


This is the description of the believers; harsh with the disbelievers, merciful and kind to the believers, angry without smiling before the

disbelievers, smiling and beaming with pleasure before his believing brother.


Is not that called discrimination????


Generic commandments Ayah to subjugate the whole world to Islam by the sword

Surah Al Tawba 9:123

ـٰٓأَيُّہَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُواْ قَـٰتِلُواْ ٱلَّذِينَ يَلُونَكُم مِّنَ ٱلۡڪُفَّارِ وَلۡيَجِدُواْ فِيكُمۡ غِلۡظَةً۬‌ۚ وَٱعۡلَمُوٓاْ أَنَّ ٱللَّهَ مَعَ ٱلۡمُتَّقِينَ


O you who have believed, fight those adjacent to you of the disbelievers and let them find in you harshness. And know that Allah is with the righteous (Sahih International)


Read any Tafsir for this ayah, let us take couple of examples of those


Tafsir Al-Jalalayn for Surah 9:123

O you who believe, fight those of the disbelievers who are near to you, that is, the nearest, followed by the next nearest of them, and let them find harshness in you, that is, severity, in other words, be harsh with them, and know that God is with the pious, helping and granting [them] victory.


Tafsir Ibn Abbas for Surah 9:123

(O ye who believe!) in Muhammad (pbuh) and in the Qur'an (Fight those of the disbelievers who are near to you) the Banu Qurayzah, Banu'l-Nadir, Fadak and Khaybar, (and let them find harshness in you) toughness from you, (and know) O believers (that Allah is with those who keep their duty (unto Him)) Allah helps the believers: Muhammad (pbuh) and his Companions, by making them victorious over their enemies.


By the way those Jewish tributes are unitarians who believe in one God and there is not one historical document that proves that those did any harm or aggression to Muhammad and his followers!!


Tafsir Ibn Kathir for Surah 9:123

Allah commands the believers to fight the disbelievers, the closest in area to the Islamic state, then the farthest.

This is why the Messenger of Allah started fighting the idolators in the Arabian Peninsula. When he finished with them and Allah gave him control over Makkah, Al-Madinah, At-Ta'if, Yemen, Yamamah, Hajr, Khyber, Hadramawt and other Arab provinces, and the various Arab tribes entered Islam in large crowds, he then started fighting the People of the Scriptures.

He began preparations to fight the Romans who were the closest in area to the Arabian Peninsula, and as such, had the most right to be called to Islam, especially since they were from the People of the Scriptures. The Prophet marched until he reached Tabuk and went back because of the extreme hardship, little rain and little supplies.

This battle occurred on the ninth year after his Hijrah.

In the tenth year, the Messenger of Allah was busy with the Farewell Hajj. The Messenger died eighty-one days after he returned from that Hajj, Allah chose him for what He had prepared for him (in Paradise).

After his death, his executor, friend, and Khalifah, Abu Bakr As-Siddiq, may Allah be pleased with him, became the leader. At that time, the religion came under attack and would have been defeated, if it had not been for the fact that Allah gave the religion firmness through Abu

Bakr, who established its basis and made its foundations firm. He brought those who strayed from the religion back to it, and made those who reverted from Islam return. He took the Zakah from the evil people who did not want to pay it, and explained the truth to those who were unaware of it. On behalf of the Prophet, Abu Bakr delivered what he was entrusted with.

Then, he started preparing the Islamic armies to fight the Roman cross worshippers, and the Persian fire worshippers. By the blessing of his mission, Allah opened the lands for him and brought down Caesar and Kisra and those who obeyed them among the servants.


And thank you Ibn Kathir for the summarized history of bloody Islam!


So this ayah admits invasion, and admits increasing the circle of invasion by time


Surah Al Anfal 8:38-39

قُل لِّلَّذِينَ ڪَفَرُوٓاْ إِن يَنتَهُواْ يُغۡفَرۡ لَهُم مَّا قَدۡ سَلَفَ وَإِن يَعُودُواْ فَقَدۡ مَضَتۡ سُنَّتُ ٱلۡأَوَّلِينَ (٣٨) وَقَـٰتِلُوهُمۡ حَتَّىٰ لَا تَكُونَ فِتۡنَةٌ۬ وَيَڪُونَ ٱلدِّينُ ڪُلُّهُ ۥ لِلَّهِ‌ۚ فَإِنِ ٱنتَهَوۡاْ فَإِنَّ ٱللَّهَ بِمَا يَعۡمَلُونَ بَصِيرٌ۬ (٣٩) وَإِن تَوَلَّوۡاْ فَٱعۡلَمُوٓاْ أَنَّ ٱللَّهَ مَوۡلَٮٰكُمۡ‌ۚ نِعۡمَ ٱلۡمَوۡلَىٰ وَنِعۡمَ ٱلنَّصِيرُ

Say to those who have disbelieved [that] if they cease, what has previously occurred will be forgiven for them. But if they return [to hostility] - then the precedent of the former [rebellious] peoples has already taken place. And fight them until there is no fitnah and [until] the religion, all of it, is for Allah . And if they cease - then indeed, Allah is Seeing of what they do.


So if we apply the cause and the final goal methodology

What was the cause to fight those people? Because they have disbelieved

What is the final goal? Until there is no fitnah and the religion, all of it is for Allah!

Is not that generic and absolute commandment our muslims brother?????

Let us check Tafasir


Tafsir al-Jalalayn for Surah 8:39

And fight them until sedition idolatry is exists no more and religion is all for God alone none other being worshipped; then if they desist from unbelief surely God sees what they do and will requite them for it.


Tafsir Ibn Kathir for Surah 8:39

Ad-Dahhak reported that Ibn Abbas said about the

Ayah, (And fight them until there is no more Fitnah...),

"So that there is no more Shirk.''

Similar was said by Abu Al-Aliyah, Mujahid, Al-Hasan, Qatadah, Ar-Rabi bin Anas, As-Suddi, Muqatil bin Hayyan and Zayd bin Aslam.

Muhammad bin Ishaq said that he was informed from Az-Zuhri, from Urwah bin Az-Zubayr and other scholars that (until there is no more Fitnah), the Fitnah mentioned here means, until no Muslim is persecuted so that he abandons his religion.

Ad-Dahhak reported that Ibn Abbas said about Allah's statement,

(and the religion (worship) will all be for Allah alone).

"So that Tawhid is practiced in sincerity with Allah.''

Al-Hasan, Qatadah and Ibn Jurayj said, (and the religion will all be for Allah alone), "So that La ilaha illa-llah is proclaimed.''

Muhammad bin Ishaq also commented on this Ayah, "So that Tawhid is practiced in sincerity towards Allah, without Shirk, all the while shunning all rivals who (are being worshipped) besides Him.''

Abdur-Rahman bin Zayd bin Aslam said about, (and the religion will all be for Allah alone), "So that La ilaha illa-llah is proclaimed.''

Muhammad bin Ishaq also commented on this Ayah, "So that Tawhid is practiced in sincerity towards Allah, without Shirk, all the while shunning all rivals who (are being worshipped) besides Him.''

There is a Hadith collected in the Two Sahihs that testifies to this explanation. The Messenger of Allah said:

I was commanded to fight against the people until they proclaim, `There is no deity worthy of worship except Allah.' If and when they say it, they will preserve their blood and wealth from me, except for its right (Islamic penal code), and their reckoning is with Allah, the Exalted and Most Honored.

Also, in the Two Sahihs, it is recorded that Abu Musa Al-

Ashari said,

"The Messenger of Allah was asked about a man who fights because he is courageous, in prejudice with his people, or to show off. Which of these is for the cause of Allah?

He said, Whoever fights so that Allah's Word is the supreme, is in the cause of Allah, the Exalted and Most Honored.''

One last interesting and decisive aspect in this article is what Tafsir Al Qurtobi said about 8:39, or Al Qurtobi I had to do the translation to english myself but it worth


Tafsir Al Qurtobi for Surah 8:39

Allah said, “Fight them” is a commandment to fight and slay every polytheist in every place, some so this ayah as abrogating (meaning it abrogates others) and others said it is not abrogating ...

But the first opinion is the more reliable and it is a directive to fight and slay as an absolute (generic) commandment and it is not conditioned by the fact that the KOFFAR (the infidel) started the fight and the evidence of that Allah TAALLA said “religion is all for God alone” and the prophet (pbuh) said “ I was commanded to fight against the people until they proclaim, `There is no deity worthy of worship except Allah.'”

So this ayah inserts that the reason of starting the fight is “KOFFR” ( that the emeny is infidel) ... and the ultimate goal is removing the “KOFF” (eliminating infidelity)


Arabic reference


{39} وَقَاتِلُوهُمْ حَتَّى لَا تَكُونَ فِتْنَةٌ وَيَكُونَ الدِّينُ كُلُّهُ لِلَّهِ فَإِنِ انْتَهَوْا فَإِنَّ اللَّهَ بِمَا يَعْمَلُونَ بَصِيرٌ

قَوْله تَعَالَى : " وَقَاتِلُوهُمْ " أَمْر بِالْقِتَالِ لِكُلِّ مُشْرِك فِي كُلّ مَوْضِع , عَلَى مَنْ رَآهَا نَاسِخَةً . وَمَنْ رَآهَا غَيْرَ نَاسِخَة قَالَ : الْمَعْنَى قَاتِلُوا هَؤُلَاءِ الَّذِينَ قَالَ اللَّه فِيهِمْ : " فَإِنْ قَاتَلُوكُمْ " وَالْأَوَّل أَظْهَر , وَهُوَ أَمْر بِقِتَالٍ مُطْلَق لَا بِشَرْطِ أَنْ يَبْدَأَ الْكُفَّار . دَلِيل ذَلِكَ قَوْله تَعَالَى : " وَيَكُون الدِّين لِلَّهِ " , وَقَالَ عَلَيْهِ السَّلَام : ( أُمِرْت أَنْ أُقَاتِلَ النَّاسَ حَتَّى يَقُولُوا لَا إِلَهَ إِلَّا اللَّه ) . فَدَلَّتْ الْآيَة وَالْحَدِيث عَلَى أَنَّ سَبَب الْقِتَال هُوَ الْكُفْر , لِأَنَّهُ قَالَ : " حَتَّى لَا تَكُونَ فِتْنَة " أَيْ كُفْر , فَجَعَلَ الْغَايَة عَدَم الْكُفْر , وَهَذَا ظَاهِر قَالَ اِبْن عَبَّاس وَقَتَادَة وَالرَّبِيع وَالسُّدِّيّ وَغَيْرهمْ : الْفِتْنَة هُنَاكَ الشِّرْك وَمَا تَابَعَهُ مِنْ أَذَى الْمُؤْمِنِينَ . وَأَصْل الْفِتْنَة : الِاخْتِبَار وَالِامْتِحَان , مَأْخُوذ مِنْ فَتَنْت الْفِضَّة إِذَا أَدْخَلْتهَا فِي النَّار لِتَمِيزَ رَدِيئَهَا مِنْ جَيِّدهَا . وَسَيَأْتِي بَيَان مَحَامِلهَا إِنْ شَاءَ اللَّه تَعَالَى .


And that is why we say the concept of subjugating the whole world to Islam by the sword it is essential to the  Islamic belief system


And finally I invite you to watch this video and say how Muslims implant into the souls of their children the culture of death

To be continued ....

Death by Fire Is an Islamic Punishment

Death by Fire Is an Islamic Punishment,

Yasmin Al-Khatib

a liberal Egyptian writer and artist

I do not understand why, after every perverted [act of] execution carried out by ISIS, most Muslims insist that these actions have nothing to do with Islam. After all, Muslim history is rife with terrifying forms of execution, similar or even identical to those used by ISIS. I am not talking of executions motivated by revenge, such as the crucifixion of Al-Khallaj,[2] the killing of Suhrawardi,[3] or the slaughter of Ibn Al-Muqaffa.[4] [Nor am I speaking of] the mutilation of dead bodies, such as the practice of displaying the heads of decapitated [victims], which was invented by the Umayyad [caliphs]. The most famous [victim of this] was the greatest rebel in Islamic history, Hussein bin 'Ali.[5] I am talking of execution [methods] used in the early Islamic period, [a period] which most of our clerics regard as the essential [source] for Islamic legislation, such as execution by fire or by being cast from a high place – two punishments that were set out for homosexuals. It was the consensus among the Prophet's companions that homosexuals had to be put to death, but they disagreed on the method. Some thought [a homosexual] should be burned alive, others advocated toppling a wall over him and leaving him to die under the rubble, and yet others thought he should be cast from the highest wall in the village and then, to complete [the task], pelted with stones. The last [method] has actually been applied by ISIS to a homosexual who was cast from a tall building in Baghdad.[6] [The first and fourth caliphs,] Abu Bakr and Ali bin Abu Talib, ordered to burn homosexuals, and this was done. A book by the historian Al-Tabari[7] states that Abu Bakr ordered his commanders, during the wars against the apostates, to burn several of them, and the book Futuh Al-Buldan ("Conquest of Lands")[8] states that [Muslim military leader and companion of the Prophet] Khaled bin Al-Walid also burned some apostate hostages.

"This demonstrates that Islamic thought is not totally free of responsibility for [the notion of] execution by fire – a fact that some people ignored, either deliberately or out of ignorance, after the execution [by fire] of the Jordanian pilot Mu'adh Al-Kasasbeh. These people justified [their position] by quoting the hadith of the Prophet – 'none is permitted to torture by fire but the Master of fire [Allah]' – even though this starkly contradicts the accounts mentioned above of the Prophet's companions executing people by fire. I myself question this hadith, since it first orders to burn people and then says the opposite – fickle [behavior] that does not befit a Prophet who was sent by Allah to guide his creations on the straight path. Here is the full text of the hadith: 'The Prophet dispatched a squadron [of warriors], telling them: "If you find the man named so-and-so and the man named so-and-so, burn them both in fire." Later he said: "I had ordered you to burn those two men in fire, but none is permitted to torture by fire but the Master of fire, so if you find them kill them."'

"In any case, the Umayyad caliphs continued meting out the punishment of death by fire, and later the Abbasid [caliphs] even improved upon it and used to roast the condemned over a slow fire until he expired, just like you roast a slaughtered animal. As for torturing people to death, there is the well-known story about the men of Urayna who took the Prophet's camels and killed the man who was tending them by gouging out his eyes with a sharp sword, cutting off his arms, legs and tongue, and then leaving him to die. When the Prophet heard of this, he ordered to cut off their arms and legs and gouge out their eyes with a red-hot iron and then cast them out into the street until they died. This [punishment] was according to the principle of subjecting [the perpetrator] to whatever he did to others, no matter how atrocious the act.

"Some may think that the purpose of this article is to blacken the image of Islam. So, in order to elaborate and clarify, let me note that, in the past, Christianity also practiced execution by fire. [This was true] especially in the Middle Ages, when the Inquisition courts burned thousands of Muslims and the Church burned thousands of women for practicing witchcraft, as well as philosophers, out of fear [that they would spread] enlightenment. But eventually the enlightenment triumphed and the Church became moderate and tolerant, as it is today. Enlightenment is our only weapon to defeat ISIS, because our real war is not against [this organization] but against extremist thinking, and if we do not confront it and beat it, a thousand [other] ISIS [organizations] will emerge."


(1), July 29, 2015.

(2) Mansour Al-Khallaj, a Sufi poet who was crucified for heresy in 922 AD.

(3)Shahab Al-Din Yahya Suhrawardi, a renowned Sufi philosopher executed for his teachings in 1191. There are contradictory reports about his death. It is variously claimed that he was starved to death, thrown from a high place, killed by the sword and/or burned.

(4)Abu Muhammad 'Abdallah Ibn Al-Muqaffa was an eighth-century Persian author, translator and philosopher who converted to Islam. In 759 he was accused of heresy by the governor of Basra and tortured to death in a horrific manner (his limbs were cut off one by one and roasted before his eyes until he died).

(5)The grandson of the Prophet, who, after the Prophet's death, claimed to be the rightful caliph instead of Yazid Abu Sufyan. In 680 he was decapitated and his head was sent to Yazid, who displayed it as a sign of his victory in the struggle for the throne. After Hussein's death, his followers became a separate Muslim sect, the Shi'ites.

(6)In fact, ISIS has executed many men for engaging in homosexual acts, using this method as well as others. See MEMRI JTTM report: "ISIS Campaign Of Executing Homosexuals – By Stoning, Shooting, Throwing Off Roofs, Public Torture: In Accordance With Shari'a Law As Explained By Influential Mainstream Islamic Preachers, Scholars On Leading Arab Media Outlets, Including Al-Jazeera, Hamas's Al-Aqsa TV – WARNING – GRAPHIC IMAGES," March 10, 2015.

(7)Muhammad Ibn Jarir Al-Tabari (d. 923) was one of Islam's fist notable historians and commentators on the Koran. His book Tarikh Al-Tabari chronicles the history of kings and prophets from the creation of the world until his own era.

(8) A history of the early conquests of Muhammad and the early caliphs by ninth-century Persian historian Ahmad Ibn Yahya Al-Baladhuri.


Yasmin Al Khatib3

Yasmin Al Khatib4

Yasmin Al Khatib5

Yasmin Al Khatib6

نعم .. إلهُ الإسْلاَم هو إِلهُ هذَا الدَّهْرِ مالفرق بين إله كل الدهور وإله هذا الدهر

نعم .. إلهُ الإسْلاَم هو إِلهُ هذَا الدَّهْرِ

مالفرق بين إله كل الدهور وإله هذا الدهر

مجديوس السكندري

إله الدهر وكل الدهور :

يقول الكتاب المقدس عن إله الدهر وكل الدهور الرب الآزلي ضابط الكل إلى ابد الأبدين فى (سفر إشعياء 40 : 28) :

" ٢٨ أَمَا عَرَفْتَ أَمْ لَمْ تَسْمَعْ ؟

إِلهُ الدَّهْرِ {أي الإله الأزلي} الرَّبُّ {أي السيد صاحب السلطان }

خَالِقُ أَطْرَافِ الأَرْضِ {الخالق العظيم}

لاَ يَكِلُّ وَلاَ يَعْيَا {أي الكلي القدرة} .

لَيْسَ عَنْ فَهْمِهِ فَحْصٌ {أي الكلي الحكمة} " ..

وإله الدهر وكل الدهور هو نفسه الذى آتخذ جسداً ولَم يَسْتَنْكِفَ أَنْ يَكُونَ عَبْدًا وظهرفى ارضنا وعاش بيننا معلناً عن نفسه أنه الوحيد الذى يهب البصر للعميان فيقول عن نفسه فى (إنجيل لوقا 4 : 18 – 19 ) :

" روح الرب علي،

لأنه مسحني لأبشر المساكين،

أرسلني لأشفي المنكسري القلوب،

لأنادي للمأسورين بالإطلاق وللعمي بالبصر،

وأرسل المنسحقين في الحرية،

وأكرز بسنة الرب المقبولة" ...

وشهد له كاتب القرآن بأنه الوحيد الذى وهب البصر للعميان :

حيث قال فى ( سورة ال عمران 3 : 49 ) :

" أَنِّي أَخْلُقُ لَكُمْ مِنَ الطِّينِ كَهَيْئَةِ الطَّيْرِ فَأَنْفُخُ فِيهِ فَيَكُونُ طَيْرًا بِإِذْنِ اللَّهِ

وَأُبْرِئُ الْأَكْمَهَ { أى المولود أعمى } وَالْأَبْرَصَ وَأُحْيِي الْمَوْتَى بِإِذْنِ اللَّهِ

وَأُنَبِّئُكُمْ {علام الغيوب} بِمَا تَأْكُلُونَ وَمَا تَدَّخِرُونَ فِي بُيُوتِكُمْ

إِنَّ فِي ذَلِكَ لَآَيَةً لَكُمْ إِنْ كُنْتُمْ مُؤْمِنِينَ " .

وأيضاً جاء فى ( سورة المائدة 5 : 110 ) :

" إِذْ أَيَّدْتُكَ بِرُوحِ الْقُدُسِ تُكَلِّمُ النَّاسَ فِي الْمَهْدِ وَكَهْلًا

وَإِذْ عَلَّمْتُكَ الْكِتَابَ وَالْحِكْمَةَ وَالتَّوْرَاةَ وَالْإِنْجِيلَ

وَإِذْ تَخْلُقُ مِنَ الطِّينِ كَهَيْئَةِ الطَّيْرِ بِإِذْنِي فَتَنْفُخُ فِيهَا فَتَكُونُ طَيْرًا بِإِذْنِي

وَتُبْرِئُ الْأَكْمَهَ وَالْأَبْرَصَ بِإِذْنِي

وَإِذْ تُخْرِجُ الْمَوْتَى بِإِذْنِي

وَإِذْ كَفَفْتُ بَنِي إِسْرَائِيلَ عَنْكَ إِذْ جِئْتَهُمْ بِالْبَيِّنَاتِ

فَقَالَ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا مِنْهُمْ إِنْ هَذَا إِلَّا سِحْرٌ مُبِينٌ " . 

إِلهُ هذَا الدَّهْرِ :

يعلن الإنجيل أن غير المؤمنين بالرب الحقيقي الذين دخلوا فى عهد مع الشيطان ونصبوه إلهاً عليهم وولياً لهم ليسود على حياتهم فى هذا الدهر {أى فترة مكوثهم فى الأرض} :

فيقول فى ( الرسالة الثانية لأهل كورنثوس ٤:‏٤) :

" الَّذِينَ فِيهِمْ إِلهُ هذَا الدَّهْرِ

قَدْ أَعْمَى أَذْهَانَ غَيْرِ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ،

لِئَلاَّ تُضِيءَ لَهُمْ إِنَارَةُ إِنْجِيلِ مَجْدِ الْمَسِيحِ،

الَّذِي هُوَ صُورَةُ اللهِ "..

ويقر كاتب القرآن معترفاً بأن إله الإسلام :

1 – يعمى الأبصار ويختم على القلوب أى يغلقها :

حيث قال كاتب القرآن فى (سورة البقرة 2 : 7) :

" خَتَمَ {أغلق} اللَّهُ عَلَى قُلُوبِهِمْ

وَعَلَى سَمْعِهِمْ {صمهم}

وَعَلَى أَبْصَارِهِمْ غِشَاوَةٌ { أعماهم } وَلَهُمْ عَذَابٌ عَظِيمٌ " .

وقال فى ( سورة محمد 47 : 23 – 24 ) :

" أُولَئِكَ الَّذِينَ لَعَنَهُمُ اللَّهُ فَأَصَمَّهُمْ وَأَعْمَى أَبْصَارَهُمْ (23)

أَفَلَا يَتَدَبَّرُونَ الْقُرْآَنَ أَمْ عَلَى قُلُوبٍ أَقْفَالُهَا (24) ".

وقال فى (سورة الأنعام 6 : 46) :

" قُلْ أَرَأَيْتُمْ إِنْ أَخَذَ اللَّهُ سَمْعَكُمْ وَأَبْصَارَكُمْ وَخَتَمَ عَلَى قُلُوبِكُمْ

مَنْ إِلَهٌ غَيْرُ اللَّهِ يَأْتِيكُمْ بِهِ انْظُرْ كَيْفَ نُصَرِّفُ الْآَيَاتِ ثُمَّ هُمْ يَصْدِفُونَ".

وفى (سورة الأنعام 6 : 110) قال :

" وَنُقَلِّبُ أَفْئِدَتَهُمْ وَأَبْصَارَهُمْ

كَمَا لَمْ يُؤْمِنُوا بِهِ أَوَّلَ مَرَّةٍ

وَنَذَرُهُمْ فِي طُغْيَانِهِمْ يَعْمَهُونَ" .

وقال فى (سورة الأغراف 7 : 179) :

" وَلَقَدْ ذَرَأْنَا { أى هيأناهم وجهزناهم لجهنم } لِجَهَنَّمَ كَثِيرًا مِنَ الْجِنِّ وَالْإِنْسِ

لَهُمْ قُلُوبٌ لَا يَفْقَهُونَ بِهَا

وَلَهُمْ أَعْيُنٌ لَا يُبْصِرُونَ بِهَا

وَلَهُمْ آَذَانٌ لَا يَسْمَعُونَ بِهَا

أُولَئِكَ كَالْأَنْعَامِ بَلْ هُمْ أَضَلُّ أُولَئِكَ هُمُ الْغَافِلُونَ " .

وقال فى (سورة النحل 16 : 108) :

" أُولَئِكَ الَّذِينَ طَبَعَ اللَّهُ { لاحظ أن الله هو الفاعل } عَلَى قُلُوبِهِمْ وَسَمْعِهِمْ وَأَبْصَارِهِمْ

وَأُولَئِكَ هُمُ الْغَافِلُونَ " .

وقال فى ( سورة يس 36 : 65 – 67 ) :

" الْيَوْمَ نَخْتِمُ عَلَى أَفْوَاهِهِمْ

وَتُكَلِّمُنَا أَيْدِيهِمْ وَتَشْهَدُ أَرْجُلُهُمْ بِمَا كَانُوا يَكْسِبُونَ (65)

وَلَوْ نَشَاءُ لَطَمَسْنَا عَلَى أَعْيُنِهِمْ فَاسْتَبَقُوا الصِّرَاطَ فَأَنَّى يُبْصِرُونَ (66)

وَلَوْ نَشَاءُ لَمَسَخْنَاهُمْ عَلَى مَكَانَتِهِمْ فَمَا اسْتَطَاعُوا مُضِيًّا وَلَا يَرْجِعُونَ (67)" .

وفى ( سورة الجاثية 45 : 23 – 24 ) :

" أَفَرَأَيْتَ مَنِ اتَّخَذَ إِلَهَهُ هَوَاهُ { أى الذى يحب إلهه }

وَأَضَلَّهُ اللَّهُ عَلَى عِلْمٍ وَخَتَمَ عَلَى سَمْعِهِ وَقَلْبِهِ

وَجَعَلَ عَلَى بَصَرِهِ غِشَاوَةً

فَمَنْ يَهْدِيهِ مِنْ بَعْدِ اللَّهِ أَفَلَا تَذَكَّرُونَ (23)

وَقَالُوا مَا هِيَ إِلَّا حَيَاتُنَا الدُّنْيَا نَمُوتُ وَنَحْيَا

وَمَا يُهْلِكُنَا إِلَّا الدَّهْرُ

وَمَا لَهُمْ بِذَلِكَ مِنْ عِلْمٍ إِنْ هُمْ إِلَّا يَظُنُّونَ (24)" .

2 - يطبع الكُفرعلى القلوب :

قال كاتب القرآن فى (سورة النساء 4 : 155) :

" فَبِمَا نَقْضِهِمْ مِيثَاقَهُمْ

وَكُفْرِهِمْ بِآَيَاتِ اللَّهِ

وَقَتْلِهِمُ الْأَنْبِيَاءَ بِغَيْرِ حَقٍّ

وَقَوْلِهِمْ قُلُوبُنَا غُلْفٌ

بَلْ طَبَعَ اللَّهُ عَلَيْهَا بِكُفْرِهِمْ فَلَا يُؤْمِنُونَ إِلَّا قَلِيلًا " .

 وقال فى ( سورة الأعراف 7 : 100 – 101 ) :

" أَوَلَمْ يَهْدِ لِلَّذِينَ يَرِثُونَ الْأَرْضَ مِنْ بَعْدِ أَهْلِهَا

أَنْ لَوْ نَشَاءُ أَصَبْنَاهُمْ بِذُنُوبِهِمْ

وَنَطْبَعُ عَلَى قُلُوبِهِمْ فَهُمْ لَا يَسْمَعُونَ (100)

تِلْكَ الْقُرَى نَقُصُّ عَلَيْكَ مِنْ أَنْبَائِهَا

وَلَقَدْ جَاءَتْهُمْ رُسُلُهُمْ بِالْبَيِّنَاتِ

فَمَا كَانُوا لِيُؤْمِنُوا بِمَا كَذَّبُوا مِنْ قَبْلُ

كَذَلِكَ يَطْبَعُ اللَّهُ عَلَى قُلُوبِ الْكَافِرِينَ (101)" .

  وقال فى (سورة التوبة 9 : 87) :

" رَضُوا بِأَنْ يَكُونُوا مَعَ الْخَوَالِفِ

وَطُبِعَ عَلَى قُلُوبِهِمْ فَهُمْ لَا يَفْقَهُونَ ".

وقال فى (سورة التوبة 9 : 93) :

" إِنَّمَا السَّبِيلُ عَلَى الَّذِينَ يَسْتَأْذِنُونَكَ

وَهُمْ أَغْنِيَاءُ رَضُوا بِأَنْ يَكُونُوا مَعَ الْخَوَالِفِ

وَطَبَعَ اللَّهُ عَلَى قُلُوبِهِمْ فَهُمْ لَا يَعْلَمُونَ " .

وقال فى (سورة يونس 10 : 74) :

" ثُمَّ بَعَثْنَا مِنْ بَعْدِهِ رُسُلًا إِلَى قَوْمِهِمْ

فَجَاءُوهُمْ بِالْبَيِّنَاتِ

فَمَا كَانُوا لِيُؤْمِنُوا بِمَا كَذَّبُوا بِهِ مِنْ قَبْلُ

كَذَلِكَ نَطْبَعُ عَلَى قُلُوبِ الْمُعْتَدِينَ " .

وقال فى (سورة الروم 30 : 59) :

" كَذَلِكَ يَطْبَعُ اللَّهُ عَلَى قُلُوبِ الَّذِينَ لَا يَعْلَمُونَ " .

وقال فى (سورة غافر 40 : 35) :

" الَّذِينَ يُجَادِلُونَ فِي آَيَاتِ اللَّهِ بِغَيْرِ سُلْطَانٍ

أَتَاهُمْ كَبُرَ مَقْتًا عِنْدَ اللَّهِ وَعِنْدَ الَّذِينَ آَمَنُوا

كَذَلِكَ يَطْبَعُ اللَّهُ عَلَى كُلِّ قَلْبِ مُتَكَبِّرٍ جَبَّارٍ {الغريب أن الجبار المتكبر من اسماء هذا الإله} " .

وقال فى (سورة محمد 47 : 16) :

" وَمِنْهُمْ مَنْ يَسْتَمِعُ إِلَيْكَ

حَتَّى إِذَا خَرَجُوا مِنْ عِنْدِكَ قَالُوا لِلَّذِينَ أُوتُوا الْعِلْمَ

مَاذَا قَالَ آَنِفًا

أُولَئِكَ الَّذِينَ طَبَعَ اللَّهُ عَلَى قُلُوبِهِمْ وَاتَّبَعُوا أَهْوَاءَهُمْ ".

وقال فى (سورة المنافقون 63 : 3) :

" ذَلِكَ بِأَنَّهُمْ آَمَنُوا ثُمَّ كَفَرُوا

فَطُبِعَ عَلَى قُلُوبِهِمْ فَهُمْ لَا يَفْقَهُونَ " .  

3 - يجعل على القلوب أكنة {أغشية} فلا يفقهون :

قال كاتب القرآن فى (سورة الأنعام 6 : 25) :

" وَمِنْهُمْ مَنْ يَسْتَمِعُ إِلَيْكَ

وَجَعَلْنَا عَلَى { الكلام عائد إله الإسلام } قُلُوبِهِمْ أَكِنَّةً { وَهِيَ جُمَعُ كِنَانٍ ، وَذَلِكَ مَا يَتَغَشَّاهَا مِنْ خُذْلَانِ اللَّهِ إِيَّاهُمْ عَنْ فَهْمِ مَا يُتْلَى عَلَيْهِمْ }

أَنْ يَفْقَهُوهُ وَفِي آَذَانِهِمْ وَقْرًا

وَإِنْ يَرَوْا كُلَّ آَيَةٍ لَا يُؤْمِنُوا بِهَا

حَتَّى إِذَا جَاءُوكَ يُجَادِلُونَكَ

يَقُولُ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا

إِنْ هَذَا إِلَّا أَسَاطِيرُ الْأَوَّلِينَ ".

وقال فى (سورة الإسراء 17 : 46) :

" وَجَعَلْنَا عَلَى قُلُوبِهِمْ أَكِنَّةً أَنْ يَفْقَهُوهُ

وَفِي آَذَانِهِمْ وَقْرًا

وَإِذَا ذَكَرْتَ رَبَّكَ فِي الْقُرْآَنِ وَحْدَهُ

وَلَّوْا عَلَى أَدْبَارِهِمْ نُفُورًا " .

وقال فى (سورة الكهف 18 : 57) :

" وَمَنْ أَظْلَمُ مِمَّنْ ذُكِّرَ بِآَيَاتِ رَبِّهِ

فَأَعْرَضَ عَنْهَا وَنَسِيَ مَا قَدَّمَتْ يَدَاهُ

إِنَّا جَعَلْنَا عَلَى قُلُوبِهِمْ أَكِنَّةً أَنْ يَفْقَهُوهُ

وَفِي آَذَانِهِمْ وَقْرًا

وَإِنْ تَدْعُهُمْ إِلَى الْهُدَى

فَلَنْ يَهْتَدُوا إِذًا أَبَدًا ".

وقال فى (سورة فصلت 41 : 5) :

" وَقَالُوا قُلُوبُنَا فِي أَكِنَّةٍ مِمَّا تَدْعُونَا إِلَيْهِ

وَفِي آَذَانِنَا وَقْرٌ وَمِنْ بَيْنِنَا وَبَيْنِكَ حِجَابٌ

فَاعْمَلْ إِنَّنَا عَامِلُونَ " .

4 – يختم على القلوب بالحق أو الضلال :

قال كاتب القرآن فى (سورة الشورى 42 : 24) :

" أَمْ يَقُولُونَ افْتَرَى عَلَى اللَّهِ كَذِبًا

فَإِنْ يَشَأِ اللَّهُ يَخْتِمْ عَلَى قَلْبِكَ

وَيَمْحُ اللَّهُ الْبَاطِلَ وَيُحِقُّ الْحَقَّ بِكَلِمَاتِهِ

إِنَّهُ عَلِيمٌ بِذَاتِ الصُّدُورِ " .

5 – يغدر بمن يستأمنه على حياته :

قال كاتب القرآن فى (سورة الأعراف 7 : 99) :

" أَفَأَمِنُوا {أى اسْتِدْرَاجه إيَّاهُمْ بِالنِّعْمَةِ وَأَخْذهمْ بَغْتَة} مَكْرَ اللَّهِ

فَلَا يَأْمَنُ مَكْرَ اللَّهِ إِلَّا الْقَوْمُ الْخَاسِرُونَ ".

عزيزي القارئ

أليست هذه أعمال الشيطان عدو الخير ؟

فهناك أكثر من 50 صفة شيطانية شان بها كاتب القرآن الله منها على سبيل المثال .. مُلهم الفجور ومزيغ القلوب وأضلال العباد والكيد المتين لهم ليبلوهم ..

قف وفكر

إِنَّ اللهَ نُورٌ وَلَيْسَ فِيهِ ظُلْمَةٌ الْبَتَّةَ،

وأسمه أبو الأنوار أي مصدر النور، والظلمة لا تدركه،

وهو غَيْرُ مُجَرَّبٍ بِالشُّرُور أى لا تعتريه افكار شر ضد أى أحد وَهُوَ لاَ يُجَرِّبُ أَحَدًا ..

وطبيعته المحبة فيُشْرِقُ شَمْسَهُ عَلَى الأَشْرَارِ وَالصَّالِحِينَ وَيُمْطِرُ عَلَىالأَبْرَارِ وَالظَّالِمِينَ ..

أما الشيطان فهو عدو كل خير الْمُخْرِبُ .. وَالنَّاهِبُ (سفر أشعياء 33 :1)

ويقول المسيح عنه فى(إنجيل يوحنا 10 : 10) :

" اَلسَّارِقُ لاَ يَأْتِي إِلاَّ لِيَسْرِقَ وَيَذْبَحَ وَيُهْلِكَ،

وَأَمَّا أَنَا فَقَدْ أَتَيْتُ لِتَكُونَ لَهُمْ حَيَاةٌ وَلِيَكُونَ لَهُمْ أَفْضَلُ " .

فاليوم أمامك إله الدهر وكل الدهور الرب الحقيقي الذى يهب البصر والبصيرة للعميان ..

وهناك إله هذا الدهر فقط أى الشيطان الذى أقام نفسه إله، يعمي كل من يقع تحت سلطانه ..

وعليك بتفعيل انسانيك الجميلة المخلوقة على صورة الله وحرك المشاعر والذهن لأتخاذ القرار بكامل آرادتك لتحدد مصيرك الأبدي من الأن ..

فمن ستختار ؟

فالمسيح يدعوك الأن قائلاً فى ( إنجيل متى 11 : 28 ) :

" ‏تعالوا إلي يا جميع المتعبين والثقيلي الأحمال، وأنا أريحكم " ..

أنه يدعوك الأن ليريحك من كل جانب،

روحياً ونفسياً وجسدياً ..

أنه مصدر الراحة الوحيد،

فتعال ليرحمك من شيطان العمي،

ويهبك عيون وبصيرة روحية لتستمتع بكل هبات الحياة الأفضل فى المسيح يسوع ..

الذى يضِيءَ لَك إِنَارَةُ إِنْجِيلِ مَجْدِه ..

ويغيرك لصورته هو أى صورة الرحمن الجميلة .

مجديوس السكندري

سورة الحمامة

سورة الحمامة

هَلْ أَتَاكَ حَدِيثُ الْحَماِمَةِ (1) يَوِمْ قَالَ إِبْرَاهِيمُ الْلَماِمَةِ (2) رَبِّ أَرِنِي كَيْفَ تُحْيِي الْمَوْتَى وَالْرَماِمَةِ (3) قَالَ أَوَلَمْ تُؤْمِنْ وَالْسَلاِمَةِ (4) قَالَ بَلَى وَلَكِنْ لِيَطْمَئِنَّ قَلْبِي وَبَّطَلْ تَلاِمَةِ (5) قَالَ فَخُذْ أَرْبَعَةً مِنَ الحَّمْاَمِ فَخُضَرْهُنَّ بَالْكَماِمَةِ (6) فَذَبَحَهُنَّ ثُمَّ قَطَّعَهُنَّ وَنَتَفَ رِيشَهُنَّ وَمَزَّقَهُنَّ وَاَلْعَّظاَمِ طَحْنَاَ وَهَشّاَمْةِ (7) خَلَطَ بَعْضَهُنَّ فِي بَعْضٍ ثُمَّ جَزَّأَهُنَّ أَجْزَاءً بَدُونِ عَلاِمَةِ (8) ثُمَّ اجْعَلْ عَلَى كُلِّ جَبَلٍ مِنْهُنَّ جُزْءًا وَخُذْ رُؤُوسَهُنّ فِي جَّيْبِ الْبَيْجاِمَةَ (9) ثُمَّ ادْعُهُنَّ يَأْتِينَكَ سَعْيًا فَدَعَهُنَّ بَاَلْقَواِمَةِ (10) فَجَعَلَ يَنْظُرُ إِلَى الرِّيشِ يَطِيرُ لَلرِّيشِ وَالدَّمِ بَالدَّمِ وَاللَّحْمِ فى اللَّحْمِ وَالْأَجْنَحةِ عَلَى كُلِّ طَائِرٍ تَلتَّصِقُ بَالْتَماِمَةِ (11) حَتَّى قَامَ كُلُّ طَائِرٍ عَلَى حِدَتِهِ لَيَّأَتَيْنَهُ يَمْشِينَ سَعْيًا بَاَلْأَسْتِقاِمَةِ (12) وَجَعَلَ كُلُّ حَمَاَمِةٍ تَجِيءُ لِتَأْخُذَ رَأْسَهُا الَّتِي فِي يَدِهِ فَإِذَا قَدَّمَ لَهُا غَيْرَهِا تَأْبَاهُا بَصَّرّاِمْةِ (13) فَتَصْرخِ اَلْرَأْسُ طالْبَةٌ حُمَّاَمَتِهِاَ بِحَوْلِ اللَّاَتِ وَقُوَّتِهِ لَصَّمَاِمْةِ (14) وَمَا نَعْجَنْ مِنْ حَمَاَّمَةٍ أَوْ نُنْسِفْهَا نَأْتِ بِخَيْرٍ مِنْهَا أَوْ مِثْلِهَا أَلَمْ تَعْلَمْ أَنَّ اللَّاَتَ عَلَى كُلِّ طَيْرٍ خَتِاَمةٌ (15)

صدق المسحوق العظيم .


أسباب النزول والصعود :

فى يوم أغبر جلس مولانا ونبينا خاتم المساحيق رابسو (صاعو) {أى صبن اللات عليه ورغا} عند برج الحمام فوق سطح بيته فتذكر النص القرآني القائل الوارد فى (سورة البقرة 2 : 260):

" وَإِذْ قَالَ إِبْرَاهِيمُ رَبِّ أَرِنِي كَيْفَ تُحْيِي الْمَوْتَى

قَالَ أَوَلَمْ تُؤْمِنْ قَالَ بَلَى وَلَكِنْ لِيَطْمَئِنَّ قَلْبِي

قَالَ فَخُذْ أَرْبَعَةً مِنَ الطَّيْرِ فَصُرْهُنَّ إِلَيْكَ

ثُمَّ اجْعَلْ عَلَى كُلِّ جَبَلٍ مِنْهُنَّ جُزْءًا

ثُمَّ ادْعُهُنَّ يَأْتِينَكَ سَعْيًا

وَاعْلَمْ أَنَّ اللَّهَ عَزِيزٌ حَكِيمٌ " .


فنزل مولانا المسحوق (صاعو){أى صبن اللات عليه ورغا} إلى غاره ثم إستوى على القاعدة ليقرأ تفسير ابن كثير للنص المريب فقرأ مايلي :

" ذَكَرُوا لِسُؤَالِ إِبْرَاهِيمَ عَلَيْهِ السَّلَامُ، أَسْبَابًا، مِنْهَا :

لَمَّا قَالَ لِنُمْرُوذَ: (رَبِّيَ الَّذِي يُحْيِي وَيُمِيتُ)

أَحَبَّ أَنْ يَتَرَقَّى مِنْ عِلْمِ الْيَقِينِ فِي ذَلِكَ إِلَى عَيْنِ الْيَقِينِ، وَأَنْ يَرَى ذَلِكَ مُشَاهِدَةً فَقَالَ:(رَبِّ أَرِنِي كَيْفَ تُحْيِ الْمَوْتَى قَالَ أَوَلَمْ تُؤْمِنْ قَالَ بَلَى وَلَكِنْ لِيَطْمَئِنَّ قَلْبِي)
فَأَمَّا الْحَدِيثُ الَّذِي رَوَاهُ الْبُخَارِيُّ عِنْدَ هَذِهِ الْآيَةِ : حَدَّثَنَا أَحْمَدُ بْنُ صَالِحٍ، حَدَّثَنَا ابْنُ وَهْبٍ، أَخْبَرَنِي يُونُسُ، عَنِ ابْنِ شِهَابٍ، عَنْ أَبِي سَلَمَةَ وَسَعِيدٍ، عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ، رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُ، قَالَ :

قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ : " نَحْنُ أَحَقُّ بِالشَّكِّ مِنْ إِبْرَاهِيمَ، إِذْ قَالَ : رَبِّ أَرِنِي كَيْفَ تُحْيِي الْمَوْتَى ؟ قَالَ : أَوَلَمْ تُؤْمِنْ . قَالَ : بَلَى ، وَلَكِنْ لِيَطْمَئِنَّ قَلْبِي " وَكَذَا رَوَاهُ مُسْلِمٌ ، عَنْ حَرْمَلَةَ بْنِ يَحْيَى ، عَنِ ابْنِ وَهْبٍ بِهِ فَلَيْسَ الْمُرَادُ هَاهُنَا بِالشَّكِّ مَا قَدْ يَفْهَمُهُ مَنْ لَا عِلْمَ عِنْدَهُ ، بِلَا خِلَافٍ . وَقَدْ أُجِيبَ عَنْ هَذَا الْحَدِيثِ بِأَجْوِبَةٍ ، أَحَدُهَا . . . .

وَقَوْلُهُ : ( قَالَ فَخُذْ أَرْبَعَةً مِنَ الطَّيْرِ فَصُرْهُنَّ إِلَيْكَ ) اخْتَلَفَ الْمُفَسِّرُونَ فِي هَذِهِ الْأَرْبَعَةِ : مَا هِيَ ؟ وَإِنْ كَانَ لَا طَائِلَ تَحْتَ تَعْيِينِهَا ، إِذْ لَوْ كَانَ فِي ذَلِكَ مُتَّهَمٌ لَنَصَّ عَلَيْهِ الْقُرْآنُ ،

فَرُوِيَ عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ أَنَّهُ قَالَ : هِيَ الْغُرْنُوقُ، وَالطَّاوُسُ، وَالدِّيكُ، وَالْحَمَامَةُ. وَعَنْهُ أَيْضًا : أَنَّهُ أَخَذَ وَزًّا ، وَرَأْلًا وَهُوَ فَرْخُ النَّعَامِ وَدِيكًا ، وَطَاوُسًا . وَقَالَ مُجَاهِدٌ وَعِكْرِمَةُ : كَانَتْ حَمَامَةً، وَدِيكًا، وَطَاوُسًا، وَغُرَابًا .

وَقَوْلُهُ : ( فَصُرْهُنَّ إِلَيْكَ) أَيْ : قَطِّعْهُنَّ .

قَالَهُ ابْنُ عَبَّاسٍ ، وَعِكْرِمَةُ ، وَسَعِيدُ بْنُ جُبَيْرٍ ، وَأَبُومَالِكٍ ، وَأَبُو الْأَسْوَدِ الدُّؤَلِيُّ ، وَوَهْبُ بْنُ مُنَبِّهٍ ، وَالْحَسَنُ ، وَالسُّدِّيُّ ، وَغَيْرُهُمْ .

وَقَالَ الْعَوْفِيُّ ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ : (فَصُرْهُنَّ إِلَيْكَ)أَوْثِقْهُنَّ ،

فَلَمَّا أَوْثَقَهُنَّ ذَبَحَهُنَّ،

ثُمَّ جَعَلَ عَلَى كُلِّ جَبَلٍ مِنْهُنَّ جُزْءًا ،

فَذَكَرُوا أَنَّهُ عَمَدَ إِلَى أَرْبَعَةٍ مِنَ الطَّيْرِ فَذَبَحَهُنَّ ،

ثُمَّ قَطَّعَهُنَّ وَنَتَفَ رِيشَهُنَّ ،

وَمَزَّقَهُنَّ وَخَلَطَ بَعْضَهُنَّ فِي بَعْضٍ {أى ضرهن فى الخلاط} ،

ثُمَّ جَزَّأَهُنَّ أَجْزَاءً ،

وَجَعَلَ عَلَى كُلِّ جَبَلٍ مِنْهُنَّ جُزْءًا ،

قِيلَ : أَرْبَعَةُ أَجْبُلٍ . وَقِيلَ : سَبْعَةٌ .

قَالَ ابْنُ عَبَّاسٍ : وَأَخَذَ رُؤُوسَهُنَّ بِيَدِهِ ،

ثُمَّ أَمَرَهُ اللَّهُ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ ، أَنْ يَدْعُوَهُنَّ ،

فَدَعَاهُنَّ كَمَا أَمَرَهُ اللَّهُ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ ،

فَجَعَلَ يَنْظُرُ إِلَى الرِّيشِ يَطِيرُ إِلَى الرِّيشِ ،

وَالدَّمِ إِلَى الدَّمِ ، وَاللَّحْمِ إِلَى اللَّحْمِ ،

وَالْأَجْزَاءِ مِنْ كُلِّ طَائِرٍ يَتَّصِلُ بَعْضُهَا إِلَى بَعْضٍ ،

حَتَّى قَامَ كُلُّ طَائِرٍ عَلَى حِدَتِهِ ،

وَأَتَيْنَهُ يَمْشِينَ سَعْيًا لِيَكُونَ أَبْلَغَ لَهُ فِي الرُّؤْيَةِ الَّتِي سَأَلَهَا ،

وَجَعَلَ كُلُّ طَائِرٍ يَجِيءُ لِيَأْخُذَ رَأْسَهُ الَّذِي فِي يَدِ إِبْرَاهِيمَ ، {أى أن كل طير يأتي حتى يأخذ راسه من الحاج ابراهيم}

عَلَيْهِ السَّلَامُ ، فَإِذَا قَدَّمَ لَهُ غَيْرَ رَأْسِهِ يَأْبَاهُ ،{وطبعا الرأس هو التى تتكلم فتقول هذه ليست حمامتي} ..

فَإِذَا قَدَّمَ إِلَيْهِ رَأْسَهُ تَرْكَبُ مَعَ بَقِيَّةِ جُثَّتِهِ بِحَوْلِ اللَّهِ وَقُوَّتِهِ ;

وَلِهَذَا قَالَ : (وَاعْلَمْ أَنَّ اللَّهَ عَزِيزٌ حَكِيمٌ)أَيْ : عَزِيزٌ لَا يَغْلِبُهُ شَيْءٌ ، وَلَا يَمْتَنِعُ مِنْهُ شَيْءٌ ، وَمَا شَاءَ كَانَ بِلَا مُمَانِعٍ لِأَنَّهُ الْعَظِيمُ الْقَاهِرُ لِكُلِّ شَيْءٍ ، حَكِيمٌ فِي أَقْوَالِهِ وَأَفْعَالِهِ وَشَرْعِهِ وَقَدْرِهِ .


أنظر تفسير ابن كثير- إسماعيل بن عمر بن كثير القرشي الدمشقي - تفسير سورة البقرة - تفسير قوله تعالى " وإذ قال إبراهيم رب أرني كيف تحيي الموتى " – الجزء الأول – ص : 690- دار طيبة - سنة النشر: 1422هـ / 2002م .



فوقع كتاب التفسير من يد مولانا الَمسحوق رابسو (صاعو){أى صبن اللات عليه ورغا} وسمع حوريات الجنة يشنفن أذانه الكبيرة بالغناء هَامسات .. ألف ليله وليله .. قصة كل ليله ...

فنام مولانا خاتم المساحيق على قفاهم ...

فقال تعال قال لما أصحي من النوم ... فنزلت سورة الحمامة التى تبحث عن رأسها .. رجاء من يجدها يبعثها للحاج إبراهيم والأجر والثواب على الله ..

سورة الخرطوم

سورة الخرطوم

خَ رْ (1) إِذَا تُتْلَى عَلَيْهِم قَرَآنُنَا قَالَوَا أَسَاطِيرُ الْأَوَّلِينَ وَمَا يُؤَمِّنُ بِهِ إِلَّا كُلُّ حُمْاَرٍ مَوِسِومٍ (2) سَنَسِمُهُم عَلَى الْخُرْطُومِ (3) وَمَا أَدْرَاكَ مَا اَلْخِرْطِّوَمْ (4) خِرَطوَّمٌ مَرْقُومٌ (5) فَىِ أَّنْفٍ مَزْكَوَّمٍ (6) مُخْتَوْنَ مِنْ مَشِرطٍ مَخْتُومٍ (7) قُلْ هُوَ الْقَادِرُ عَلَى أَنْ يَطَيَلَ خَرَاَطْيِمَكُمْ مَدَدًا مِنْ أَنَوْفِكُمْ أَوْ مِنْ بَيْنِ أَرْجُلِكُمْ كَالزَلْوَّمِ (8) قِرَآَنٌ أُنْزِلَ إِلَيْكَ فَلَا يَكُنْ فِي صَدْرِكَ حَرَجٌ مِنْهُ أَوْ مَهْمَوَم (9) فَتَقْعُدَ مَلُومًا كَاَلْمَظْلُوَم بَدَنَكْ مَسْمَّوَم (10) فَأَصْبَحَتْ كَالمَّصْرَوَمِ (11) وَإِذَا رَأَيْتَ الَّذِينَ يَخُوضُونَ فِي قَرَآنِنَا فَأَعْرِضْ عَنْهُمْ حَتَّى يَخُوضُوا فِي حَدِيثٍ مَحْمِوَمِ (12) وَإِمَّا يُنْسِيَنَّكَ اَللَّاَتُ فَلَا تَقْعُدْ بَعْدَ الذِّكْرَى مَعَ هَؤُلَاءِ الْقَوْمِ (13) فَدَعْهُمْ يَخُوضُوا وَيَلْعَبُوا حَتَّى يُلَاقُوا يَوْمَهُمُ اَلْمَحْتَّوَم (14) ثُمَّ إِنَّهُمْ لَصَالُو الْجَحِيمِ اَلْمَعْلَّوَم (15) .

صدق المسحوق العظيم

أسباب النزول والصعود :

قرأ مولانا المَسحوق العظيم رابسو {صار- أى صبن اللات رأسه} النبي الخاتم للمساحيق على قفاهم تهديد كاتب القرآن للذين حادوا آيات القرآن وقالوا أنه خرافات وخزعبلات من أساطير الأولين بأنه سيشوه خراطيمهم بسمة تجلب عليهم العار ..

فيقول كاتب القرآن فى (سورة القلم 68 : 15 – 16 ) :

"إِذَا تُتْلَى عَلَيْهِ آَيَاتُنَا قَالَ أَسَاطِيرُ الْأَوَّلِينَ (15)

سَنَسِمُهُ عَلَى الْخُرْطُومِ (16) " .

ولما رجع مولانا المَسحوق {صار- أى صبن اللات رأسه} لتفسير القرطبي للنص وجد مايلي :

قَوْلُهُ تَعَالَى : سَنَسِمُهُ عَلَى الْخُرْطُومِ فِيهِ مَسْأَلَتَانِ :
الْأُولَى : قَوْلُهُ تَعَالَى : سَنَسِمُهُ قَالَ ابْنُ عَبَّاسٍ : مَعْنَى سَنَسِمُهُ سَنَخْطِمُهُ بِالسَّيْفِ .

قَالَ : وَقَدْ خُطِمَ الَّذِي نَزَلَتْ فِيهِ يَوْمَ بَدْرٍ بِالسَّيْفِ ; فَلَمْ يَزَلْ مَخْطُومًا إِلَى أَنْ مَاتَ .

وَقَالَ قَتَادَةُ : سَنَسِمُهُ يَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ عَلَى أَنْفِهِ سِمَةً يُعْرَفُ بِهَا ; يُقَالُ : وَسَمْتُهُ وَسْمًا وَسِمَةٌ إِذَا أَثَّرْتُ فِيهِ بِسِمَةٍ وَكَيٍّ .

فَأَفَادَتْ هَذِهِ الْآيَةُ عَلَامَةً ثَالِثَةً وَهِيَ الْوَسْمُ عَلَى الْأَنْفِ بِالنَّارِ ;

وَهَذَا كَقَوْلِهِ تَعَالَى : يُعْرَفُ الْمُجْرِمُونَ بِسِيمَاهُمْ قَالَهُ :الْكَلْبِيُّ وَغَيْرُهُ

. وَقَالَ أَبُو الْعَالِيَةِ وَمُجَاهِدٌ : سَنَسِمُهُ عَلَى الْخُرْطُومِ أَيْ عَلَى أَنْفِهِ ،

وَالْخُرْطُومُ : الْأَنْفُ مِنَ الْإِنْسَانِ !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

وَخَرَاطِيمُ الْقَوْمِ : سَادَاتُهُمْ {يعني لما المُسلم حد كبير من السادة الأفاضل ينادي عليه ويقول له أهلاً ياحاج خرطوم ... كبروا ياخوه } .

وَقَالَ النَّضْرُ بْنُ شُمَيْلٍ : الْمَعْنَى سَنَحُدُّهُ عَلَى شُرْبِ الْخَمْرِ ، وَالْخُرْطُومُ : الْخَمْرُ ، وَجَمْعُهُ خَرَاطِيمُ ، قَالَ الشَّاعِرُ :

تَظَلُّ يَوْمَكَ فِي لَهْوٍ وَفِي طَرَبٍ               وَأَنْتَ بِاللَّيْلِ شَرَّابُ الْخَرَاطِيمِ

قَالَ الرَّاجِزُ الْعَجَّاجُ : صَهْبَاءُ خُرْطُومًا عَقَارًا قَرْقَفَا وَقَالَ آخَرُ :

أَبَا حَاضِرٍ مَنْ يَزْنِ يُعْرَفْ زِنَاؤُهُ      وَمَنْ يَشْرَبِ الْخُرْطُومَ يُصْبِحْ مُسْكَرَا


بل وقرأ مولانا المَسحوق {صار- أى صبن اللات رأسه} ما قال الشيخ محمد بن علي بن محمد الشوكاني فى كتابه " فتح القدير الجامع بين فني الرواية والدراية" المعروف بتفسير فتح القدير – فى تفسير سورة الناس عن الوسوس الخناس بأن الوسواس الخناس وخرطوم الكلب هما :
كَخُرْطُومِ الْكَلْبِ :
قَالَ قَتَادَةُ : إِنَّ الشَّيْطَانَ لَهُ خُرْطُومٌ كَخُرْطُومِ الْكَلْبِ فِي صَدْرِ الْإِنْسَانِ {كويس أنه مش فى بطنه} ، فَإِذَا غَفَلَ ابْنُ آدَمَ عَنْ ذِكْرِ اللَّهِ وَسْوَسَ لَهُ ، وَإِذَا ذَكَرَ الْعَبْدُ رَبَّهُ خَنَسَ .

ووجد مولانا المسحوق رابسو {صار- أى صبن اللات رأسه} أن الشَّيْطَانَ وَاضِعٌ خُرْطُومَهُ فى قلب المُسلم:  
حيث أَخْرَجَ أَبُو يَعْلَى ، عَنْ أَنَسٍ ، قَالَ : قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ :

"إِنَّ الشَّيْطَانَ وَاضِعٌ خُرْطُومَهُ عَلَى قَلْبِ ابْنِ آدَمَ ،

فَإِنْ ذَكَرَ اللَّهَ خَنَسَ - أَيْ : سَكَنَ {أى هدء الخرطوم}

وَإِنْ نَسِيَ الْتَقَمَ قَلْبَهُ {أى أكل الخرطوم قلبه- سبحان اللات من الفلاتات} ، فَذَلِكَ الْوَسْوَاسِ الْخَنَّاس .


وتيقن نبينا المَسحوق رابسو {صار- أى صبن اللات رأسه} خاتم المساحيق على قفاهم، من ولع إله الإسلام بخراطيم الكفار وخرطوم الكلب وخرطوم الشيطان ... فقال تعال قال لما أقفل الصنبور فنزلت سورة الخرطوم على مولانا المسحوق فباش ورغا وأخرج الفقاقيع ...

مجديوس السكندري

الزِّرَاطَ الْمُسْتَقِيمَ

الزِّرَاطَ الْمُسْتَقِيمَ

مروان الأشوري


اهْدِنَا الزِّرَاطَ الْمُسْتَقِيمَ (6) زِرَاطَ الَّذِينَ أَنْعَمْتَ عَلَيْهِمْ غَيْرِ الْمَغْضُوبِ عَلَيْهِمْ وَلَا الضَّالِّينَ (7)

عزيزي المُسلم هل تعلم أن هذه القراءة هى القراءة الصحيحة للفاتحة برواية خلاد عن حمزة الكوفي :

وقد ذكر الشوكاني فى تفسيره للفاتحة فى كتابه " فتح القدير الجامع بين فني الرواية والدراية " الجزء الأول ص 19

" وَأَخْرَجَ أَيْضًا عَنْ حَمْزَةَ أَنَّهُ كَانَ يَقْرَأُ الزِّرَاطَ بِالزَّايِ قَالَ الْفَرَّاءُ : وَهِيَ لُغَةٌ لِعُذْرَةَ وَكَلْبٍ وَبَنِي الْقَيْنِ ." .

ويقول المُهلوس الشيخ الدكتور علي منصور الكيالي :

أن الشيطان يتحرك بقوة الدفع النفاث أى أن الشيطان يتحرك بقوة الزراط المستقيم ...


الصفحة 1 من 2