Arabic English French Persian
Quran allowed Muhammad to take any woman he wants even if married

 

Muhammad the Corrupted postman who abused prophecy - part 9

 

Quran allowed Muhammad to take any woman he wants even if married

Sakr Al Majid

Part 8 we saw Muhammad came with a whole Surah in Quran just to curse his own uncle and following is the link

http://www.islamicbag.com/quran-hadith/mohammed/item/2368-part7moeabusebribeintoislam-en

 

The Muhammadian abuse for false prophecy is not coming to a foreseen end soon, though he was married to 9 women and that beside concubines and female war captives, Muhammad wanted more women from within the people following him and already Muslim and for that he needed an Ayah and that Ayah is Q33.50-51

 

يَـٰٓأَيُّهَا ٱلنَّبِىُّ إِنَّآ أَحۡلَلۡنَا لَكَ أَزۡوَٲجَكَ ٱلَّـٰتِىٓ ءَاتَيۡتَ أُجُورَهُنَّ وَمَا مَلَكَتۡ يَمِينُكَ مِمَّآ أَفَآءَ ٱللَّهُ عَلَيۡكَ وَبَنَاتِ عَمِّكَ وَبَنَاتِ عَمَّـٰتِكَ وَبَنَاتِ خَالِكَ وَبَنَاتِ خَـٰلَـٰتِكَ ٱلَّـٰتِى هَاجَرۡنَ مَعَكَ وَٱمۡرَأَةً۬ مُّؤۡمِنَةً إِن وَهَبَتۡ نَفۡسَہَا لِلنَّبِىِّ إِنۡ أَرَادَ ٱلنَّبِىُّ أَن يَسۡتَنكِحَہَا خَالِصَةً۬ لَّكَ مِن دُونِ ٱلۡمُؤۡمِنِينَۗ قَدۡ عَلِمۡنَا مَا فَرَضۡنَا عَلَيۡهِمۡ فِىٓ أَزۡوَٲجِهِمۡ وَمَا مَلَڪَتۡ أَيۡمَـٰنُهُمۡ لِكَيۡلَا يَكُونَ عَلَيۡكَ حَرَجٌ۬ۗ وَكَانَ ٱللَّهُ غَفُورً۬ا رَّحِيمً۬ا (٥٠) ۞ تُرۡجِى مَن تَشَآءُ مِنۡہُنَّ وَتُـٔۡوِىٓ إِلَيۡكَ مَن تَشَآءُۖ وَمَنِ ٱبۡتَغَيۡتَ مِمَّنۡ عَزَلۡتَ فَلَا جُنَاحَ عَلَيۡكَۚ ذَٲلِكَ أَدۡنَىٰٓ أَن تَقَرَّ أَعۡيُنُہُنَّ وَلَا يَحۡزَنَّ وَيَرۡضَيۡنَ بِمَآ ءَاتَيۡتَهُنَّ ڪُلُّهُنَّۚ وَٱللَّهُ يَعۡلَمُ مَا فِى قُلُوبِكُمۡۚ وَڪَانَ ٱللَّهُ عَلِيمًا حَلِيمً۬ا

 

O prophet, We have made lawful for you all your wives whom you have given their dowers, 21and those (bondwomen) whom you own, out of the captives Allah has given to you as spoils of war, and daughters of your paternal uncle, and daughters of your paternal aunts, and daughters of your maternal uncle, and daughters of your maternal aunts, who have migrated with you, and a believing woman who offers herself for (marrying) the prophet without dower, if the prophet wishes to bring her into his marriage,these rules being exclusive for you, and not for the (rest of the) believers, - We know what We have prescribed for them in respect of their wives and the slave-girls they own - so that there should be no difficulty for you. Allah is Most-Forgiving, Very-Merciful

ou may postpone (the turn) of any one you wish from among them, and may accommodate with you any one you wish. And should you recall any one from those whom you kept aside, there is no blame on you...

 

So as you see in the ayah even before going into interpretation or Tafsir, it says “these rules being exclusive to you and not the rest of believers”

Dear Muslims, did you ever saw before in Abrahamic religions God specifies laws and rules that only apply to one person in history???? And those laws and rules give him marital privileges for himself only???

 

Now lets examine some of those rules Allah customized only for Muhammad

 

Tafsir Ibn Kathir

(50. O Prophet! Verily, We have made lawful to you your wives, to whom you have paid their due (dowery), and those (slaves) whom your right hand possesses -- whom Allah has given to you, and the daughters of your paternal uncles and the daughters of your paternal aunts and the daughters of your maternal uncles and the daughters of your maternal aunts who migrated with you, and a believing woman if she offers herself to the Prophet, and the Prophet wishes to marry her -- a privilege for you only, not for the (rest of) the believers. Indeed We know what We have enjoined upon them about their wives and those (slaves) whom their right hands possess, in order that there should be no difficulty on you. And Allah is Ever Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.)

 

http://www.qtafsir.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1840&Itemid=89

 

So the specific rule is that any woman can come to Muhammad and offer herself to him in marriage and if he wants he can join her to his wives but does it stop their? Let us examine more resources

 

Tafsir Al Qurtubi

Ok in Qurtubi tafsir we find a disaster, but since I don’t have access to english Qurtubi and I don’t want to waste my time translating tafsir I will only translate that snippet that takes about 10 privileges only specific to Muhammad and one of them is this:

 

Previlage # 10: If the prophet eyes felt down on a woman (means Muhammad looked to a woman and he desired her) her husband is obliged to divorce her so Muhammad can marry her

 

And following is the arabic reference with this statement highlighted in yellow

Arabic Reference

 q33.50 KortobiHusbandShouldDevorce

http://quran.al-islam.com/Page.aspx?pageid=221&BookID=14&Page=424

 

Is that a prophet you can trust for your eternal destiny?

 

Aisha admits Muhammad abusing Quran

Because of Q33.50-51 Aisha just exactly admitted that Muhammad is abusing the religious system he is building for his own benefit and desires as we see in the following Hadith

 

Hadith Muslims

 HadithMuslimAeshaYourLordHastenToYourDesire

https://sunnah.com/muslim/17/64

 

Hadith Bukhari

 HadithBukhariAeshaYourLordHastenToYourDesire

https://sunnah.com/urn/181230

 

So basically if Muhammad own wife Aisha said that Allah is running fast to fulfill his prophet sexual desires and privileges, why would you defend him as true and genuine one?????

 

Now one might ask, ok did Muhammad used that license to join any muslima to his herds of wives even if she is already married??? The answer is yes he did stay tuned for the next article

 

To be continued ..

Muhammad killed old people in way that shows immoral character

 

Muhammadian wars was offensive not defensive part 11

 

Muhammad killed old people in way that shows immoral character

 

Part 10 of this series of articles we saw  Muhammad did mutilate the bodies of his opponents  and following is the link

 

http://www.islamicbag.com/quran-hadith/mohammed/item/2520-part10moemutilatebodies-en

 

Today we will continue debunking a lying Islamic Meme that claims that Muhammad had a high standard of war code of ethics and we will debunk each of the claims in that meme one by one.

The claim that Muhammad code of conducts in war is not to kill old people, is that true??

Really??? Then why did muhammad murdered an old woman called Um Kirfa just for writing a poem admitting her negative opinion about muhammad??/?

 

Umm Qirfa was an old Arab woman contemporaneous to muhammad, the prophet of Islam. She belonged to a pagan tribe named Banu Fazara at Wadi Al-Qurra. This old woman who was also a chief of her clan was brutally killed when muhammad and his followers raided her tribe and overpowered them. The incident took place almost six years after muhammad’s Hijra (هِجْرَة Migration) to Medina in 622 AD.

 

Following is the evidence from early and independent islamic resources

Ibn Ishaq, the first authentic biographer of Muhammad gives us the details in his Sirat Rasul Allah (Ibn Ishaq 980):

 

Ibn Ishaq 980

Zayd B. Haritha’s raid on Banu Fazara and the Death of Umm Qirfa

 

Zayd also raided Wadi-l-Qurra where he met Banu Fazara and some of his companions were killed; he himself carried wounded from the field. Ward b. Amr b. Madash one of B. Sad b. Hudhayl was killed by one of B. Badr whose name Sa’d b. Hudhaym. When Zayd came he swore that he would use no ablution until he raided B. Fazara; and when he recovered from his wounds the apostle sent him against them with a force. He fought them in Wadi-al-Qura and killed some of them. Qays b. al-Musahhar al-Yamuri killed Mas’ada b. Hakama b. Malik b. Hudhayfa b. Badr and Umm Qirfa Fatima was taken prisoner. She was a very old woman, wife of Malik. Her daughter and Abdulla b. Mas’ada were also taken. Zaid ordered Qays b al-Musahhar to kill Umm Qirfa and he killed her cruelly.

Then they brought Umm Qirfa’s daughter and Mas’ada’s son to the apostle. The daughter of Umm Qirfa belonged to Salama b. Amr b. al-Akwa who had taken her. She held a position of honor among her people, and the Arabs used to say, “Had you been more powerful than Umm Qirfa you could have done no more”. Salama asked the apostle to let him have her and he gave her to him and he presented her to his uncle Hazn b. Abu Wahb and she bare him Abdul-Rahman . Hazn.Then they brought Umm Qirfa’s daughter and Mas’ada’s son to the apostle. The daughter of Umm Qirfa belonged to Salama b. Amr b. al-Akwa who had taken her. She held a position of honor among her people, and the Arabs used to say, “Had you been more powerful than Umm Qirfa you could have done no more”. Salama asked the apostle to let him have her and he gave her to him and he presented her to his uncle Hazn b. Abu Wahb and she bare him Abdul-Rahman . Hazn.

 

“And he killed her cruelly”. The cruel method used by the holy warriors of Muhammad to kill Umm Qirfa is described in Al-Tabari:

“By putting a rope into her two legs and to two camels and driving them until they rent her in two....”

Tabari Vol.8:Page.96

Allah’s Messenger sent Zayd to Wadi Qura, where he encountered the Banu Fazarah. Some of his Companions were killed, and Zayd was carried away wounded. Ward was slain by the Banu Badr. When Zayd returned, he vowed that no washing should touch his head until he had raided the Fazarah. After he recovered, Muhammad sent him with an army against the Fazarah settlement. He met them in Qura and inflicted casualties on them and took Umm Qirfah prisoner. He also took one of Umm’s daughters and Abdallah bin Mas’adah prisoner. Zyad bin Harithah ordered Qays to kill Umm, and he killed her cruelly. He tied each of her legs with a rope and tied the ropes to two camels, and they split her in two

 

Muslims, do you see how merciful and honorable is your prophet????

 

Watch the video

 

 

To be continued ....

 

Related articles

-Islam the religion that places mankind into slavery, part 2 is that it is permissible to force people to enter Islam and Muhammad admitted that was spread by sword and terror in Quran and Hadith

http://www.islamicbag.com/quran-hadith/qur-anic-studies/item/1692-en-islamandslaverypart2forcedslavery

 

-The Muslim who never invade nor thought about it is not a true Muslim (Hadith Sahih)

http://www.islamicbag.com/news-articles/reality-islam/item/2097-part2moeoffensivemuslimsinvade-en

 

-The Quran generic commandments to subjugate the whole world to Islam using the sword

http://www.islamicbag.com/news-articles/reality-islam/item/2101-part3genericcommandmentstosubjcatetheworld-en

 

References

 

https://wikiislam.net/wiki/The_Story_of_Umm_Qirfa

The Surah that made Angel Gabriel God of muhammad

 

Muslims likes to talk much about Oneness of Allah or what they call TAWHID and they talk about too much to the degree that makes you think, are Muslims hiding something??? Is really Quran a book of TAWHID?? But if so what about the incidents in Surah 53?

 

People would think I will talk about “Al Garanic event” but no I will talk about another one but first let us check the first ayah in Surah Al Najm 53

 

Q53:1

By the star when it descends

By the way it is not descends it is fallen because the arabic word used is “HAWA” means something fallan rabidly like a airplane that suddenly fallen

So Allah swears with a fallen star?? Specially if you know that in the hebrew bible or the old testament fallen star is simply satan

If we understand the first 10 ayahs of Q53 in context it is talking about a being came from above that descended to give an inspiration to muhammad

 

Now if Muslims will come and say that this being who came from above and give an inspiration is Allah SWT himself that is not possible for the whole reason

First: the whole Islamic doctrine is that the inspiration was given by Allah but through Gebriel (claimed Archangel Gabriel), and we find that for example in Q96, Q74:1-3 and others

Second:Q53:8-9 says “Then he approached and descended and was at a distance of two bow lengths or nearer”

And according to Islam Allah does not come close and does not descends

 

Also here is example of TAFASIR that said who approached and descended is Gebriel

 

The Tafsirs for Q53:5

Ibn Abbas says that is about Gebriel

Q53 5 ibnAbbas

 

http://altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=0&tTafsirNo=73&tSoraNo=53&tAyahNo=5&tDisplay=yes&UserProfile=0&LanguageId=2

 

And Al Jalalayn and Ibn Kathir says the same

http://altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=0&tTafsirNo=74&tSoraNo=53&tAyahNo=5&tDisplay=yes&UserProfile=0&LanguageId=2

 

http://www.qtafsir.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1696&Itemid=109

 

The Tafsirs for Q53:6

Ibn Kathir says that Ayah is concerning Gebriel

Q53 6 ibnKathir

http://www.qtafsir.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1696&Itemid=109

 

And Al Jalalyin and Ibn Abbas concurs

http://altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=0&tTafsirNo=74&tSoraNo=53&tAyahNo=6&tDisplay=yes&UserProfile=0&LanguageId=2

 

http://altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=0&tTafsirNo=73&tSoraNo=53&tAyahNo=6&tDisplay=yes&UserProfile=0&LanguageId=2

 

The Tafsirs for Q53:7

Again all the Tafasir says this is also referring to Gabrial

http://www.qtafsir.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1696&Itemid=109

 

http://altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=0&tTafsirNo=73&tSoraNo=53&tAyahNo=7&tDisplay=yes&UserProfile=0&LanguageId=2

 

http://altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=0&tTafsirNo=74&tSoraNo=53&tAyahNo=7&tDisplay=yes&UserProfile=0&LanguageId=2

The Tafsirs for Q53:8-9

Who descended and came closer to muhammad was angel Gabriel

Q53 8 ibnAbbas

Ibn Abbas concurs

 

http://altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=0&tTafsirNo=73&tSoraNo=53&tAyahNo=8&tDisplay=yes&UserProfile=0&LanguageId=2

 

And so did Ibn Kathir for example

http://www.qtafsir.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1695&Itemid=109

 

So according to the previous let's talk those ayahs together in context

 

Q53:5-10

Taught to him by one intense in strength{referring to Angel Gabriel}

One of soundness. And he rose to [his] true form{referring to Angel Gabriel}

While he was in the higher [part of the] horizon{referring to Angel Gabriel}

Then he approached and descended{referring to Angel Gabriel}

And was at a distance of two bow lengths or nearer {referring to Angel Gabriel}

And he {then it must be referring to Angel Gabriel}revealed to His Servant{referring to muhammad}what he revealed

 

So directly Q53:10 admits that Muhammad is the slave of Angel Gabriel!

 

If we asked Gabriel who is muhammad to you? The answer according to Q53:10 will be “He is my slave”, can you deny that Muslim brothers???

 

Angel Gabriel is definitely and undeniably the Lord of muhammad according to Q53:10, for muhammad Angel Gabriel is the God of Muhammad

The least we can say that “muhammad is the slave of the Angel Gabriel” and that is enough to bring Islamic TAWHID down

 

Did the tafasir tried to work around it? Some of it admitted the truth for example

 

Tanwîr al-Miqbâs min Tafsîr Ibn ‘Abbâs forQ53:10

 Q53 10 ibnAbbas

http://altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=0&tTafsirNo=73&tSoraNo=53&tAyahNo=10&tDisplay=yes&UserProfile=0&LanguageId=2

 

According to Q53:10Angel Gabriel is the God of muhammad, case closed.

Muhammad in the arabian peninsula was no more than an ancient version of Al Capone Mafia
 

Muhammadian wars was offensive not defensive part 5

 

Muhammad in the arabian peninsula was no more than an ancient version of Al Capone Mafia

 

Part 4 of this article we saw that Under a fake cover of TAWHID, Muhammad started the invasion with hidden agenda of greed

 

http://www.islamicbag.com/quran-hadith/mohammed/item/2225-part4muhammadstartedwarsforhisambitions-en

 
 

Today we will provide more evidences that Muhammad started the aggression to invade having a hidden agenda of greed

 
 

Muhammad Looting and plundering trade caravans

We see in Surah Al Baqara 2:217 the following

They ask you about the sacred month - about fighting therein. Say, "Fighting therein is great , but averting from the way of Allah and disbelief in Him and al-Masjid al-Haram and the expulsion of its people therefrom are greater [evil] in the sight of Allah . And fitnah is greater than killing." And they will continue to fight you until they turn you back from your religion if they are able. And whoever of you reverts from his religion [to disbelief] and dies while he is a disbeliever - for those, their deeds have become worthless in this world and the Hereafter, and those are the companions of the Fire, they will abide therein eternally.

 
 


And Tafsir Ibn Kathir for 2:217

Ibn Abu Hatim reported that Jundub bin Abdullah said: Allah's Messenger assembled a group of men under the command of Abu Ubaydah bin Jarrah. When he was about to march, he started crying for the thought of missing Allah's Messenger. Consequently, the Messenger relieved Abu

Ubaydah from command, appointed Abdullah bin Jahsh instead, gave him some written instructions and commanded him not to read the instructions

until he reached such and such area. He also saidto Abdullah:

Do not compel any of your men to continue marching with you thereafter.

When Abdullah read the instructions, he recited Istirja` (saying, `Truly! to Allah we belong and truly, to Him we shall return'; (2:156)) and said, "I hear

and obey Allah and His Messenger.'' He then told his companions the story and read the instructions to them, and two men went back while the rest remained. Soon after, they found Ibn Hadrami (one of the disbelievers of Quraysh) and killed him not knowing that that day was in Rajab or Jumadi

The polytheists said to the Muslims, "You have committed murder in the Sacred Month.''

Allah then revealed: (They ask you concerning fighting in the Sacred Months. Say, "Fighting therein is a great (transgression)...'').

 
 

Abdullah entered the Hijaz area (western Arabia) until he reached an area called Buhran, close to Furu. There, Sa`d bin Abu Waqqas and Utbah bin Ghazwan lost the camel that they were riding in

turns, and they went back to search for it while Abdullah bin Jahsh and the rest of his companions continued until they reached Nakhlah.

Then, a caravan belonging to the Quraysh passed by carrying raisins, food stuff and some trade items for the Quraysh.

Amr bin Hadrami, whose name was Abdullah bin Abbad, was in the caravan, as well as Uthman bin Abdullah bin Al-Mughirah and his brother Nawfal bin Abdullah from the tribe of Makhzum, and Al-

Hakam bin Kaysan, a freed slave of Hisham bin Al-Mughirah. When they saw the Companions they were frightened, but when they saw

Ukkashah bin Mihsan their fears subsided, since his head was shaved. They said, "These people seek the Umrah, so there is no need to fear them.''

The Companions conferred among themselves. That day was the last day in the (sacred) month of Rajab. They said to each other, "By Allah! If you let them pass, they will soon enter the Sacred Area and take refuge in it from you. If you kill them, you will kill them during the Sacred Month.''

They at first hesitated and did not like to attack them. They then began encouraging themselves and decided to kill whomever they could among the disbelievers and to confiscate whatever they had.

Hence, Waqid bin Abdullah At-Tamimi shot an arrow at Amr bin Al-Hadrami and killed him. Uthman bin Abdullah and Al-Hakam bin Kaysan gave themselves up, while Nawfal bin Abdullah was able to outrun them in flight.

 
 

Later on, Abdullah bin Jahsh and his companions went back to Allah's Messenger in Al-Madinah with the caravan and the two prisoners.

 

The Quraysh said that Muhammad and his Companions violated the sanctity of the Sacred Month and shed blood, confiscated property and took prisoners during it. Those who refuted them among the Muslims who remained in Makkah replied that the Muslims had done that during the month of Shaban (which is not a sacred month).

 
 

So based on this history information, Muhammad started conflict by breaking an important covenant and that is “the sanctity of the of sacred Month” and attacked the trading caravan and killed people and took the caravan as booty!

What a peaceful prophet!

 
 

Why did Muhammad looted and killed  Bani Mustaliq?

Suddenly Muhammad aggressed Bani Mustaliq to take their belongings and following is the Sahih Hadith

 

Sahih al-Bukhari » Book of Manumission of Slaves » Hadith # 2541

 

Chapter: Whoever possessed Arab slaves

 

Narrated Ibn `Aun:

I wrote a letter to Nafi` and Nafi` wrote in reply to my letter that the Prophet (ﷺ) had suddenly attacked Bani Mustaliq without warning while they were heedless and their cattle were being watered at the places of water. Their fighting men were killed and their women and children were taken as captives; the Prophet (ﷺ) got Juwairiya on that day. Nafi` said that Ibn `Umar had told him the above narration and that Ibn `Umar was in that army.

 

http://sunnah.com/bukhari/49/25

 

the same hadith is also in Muslim as following

http://sunnah.com/muslim/32/1

 
 
 

Anyone who has killed an enemy and has a proof of that, will posses his spoils!

And this is a rule that have been set by Muhammad and this is the hadith

 

Sahih Muslim » The Book of Jihad and Expeditions » Hadith #  1751 c

 

Chapter: The killer is entitled to the belongings of the one who is kille

Abu Qatada reported:

We accompanied the Messenger of Allah (my peace be upon him) on an expedition in the year of the Battle of Hunain. When we encountered the enemy, (some of the Muslims turned back (in fear). I saw that a man from the polytheists overpowered one of the Muslims. I turned round and attacked him from behind giving a blow between his neck and shoulder. He turned towards me and grappled with me in such a way that I began to see death staring me in the face. Then death overtook him and left me alone. I joined 'Umar b. al-Khattab who was saying: What has happened to the people (that they are retreating)? I said: It is the Decree of Allah. Then the people returned. (The battle ended in a victory for the Muslims) and the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) sat down (to distribute the spoils of war). He said: One who has killed an enemy and can bring evidence to prove it will get his belongings. So I stood up and said: Who will give evidence for me? Then I sat down. Then he (the Holy Prophet) said like this. I stood up (again) and said: Who will bear witness for me? He (the Holy Prophet) made the same observation the third time, and I stood up (once again). Now the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: What has happened to you, O Abu Qatada? Then I related the (whole) story, to him. At this, one of the people said: He has told the truth. Messenger of Allah 1 The belongings of the enemy killed by him are with me. Persuade him to forgo his right (in my favour). (Objecting to this proposal) Abu Bakr said: BY Allah, this will not happen. The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) will not like to deprive one of the lions from among the lions of Allah who fight in the cause of Allah and His Messenger and give thee his share of the booty. So the Messenger of Allah (may peace he upon him) said: He (Abu Bakr) has told the truth, and so give the belongings to him (Abu Qatada). So he gave them to me. I sold the armour (which was a part of my share of the booty) and bought with the sale proceeds a garden in the street of Banu Salama. This was the first property I acquired after embracing Islam. In a version of the hadith narrated by Laith, the words uttered by Abu Bakr are:" No, never! He will not give it to a fox from the Quraish leaving aside a lion from the lions of Allah among...." And the hadith is closed with the words:" The first property I acquired."

 

http://sunnah.com/muslim/32/49

 

and the same hadith is also in Bukhari

http://sunnah.com/bukhari/57/50

 
 

This is called the Jungle law, what a religion to build a great civilizations!

And this is another hadith to concur the same

 
 

Sahih al-Bukhari » Book of Fighting for the Cause of Allah (Jihaad) » Hadith # 3051

 

Chapter: If an infidel warrior comes in an Islamic territory

 

Narrated Salama bin Al-Akwa`:

"An infidel spy came to the Prophet (ﷺ) while he was on a journey. The spy sat with the companions of the Prophet (ﷺ) and started talking and then went away. The Prophet (ﷺ) said (to his companions), 'Chase and kill him.' So, I killed him." The Prophet (ﷺ) then gave him the belongings of the killed spy (in addition to his share of the war booty).

 

http://sunnah.com/bukhari/56/257

 

Did you read that??? Al capone mafia scene just happened! In one moment talking to each other and in another bang bang kill him and take his belongings as war booty!

 

Yes according to the earliest islamic sources, Muhammad lived the life of a war monger Looting and plundering trade caravans for possessions and women

 

Please also read the related articles

-The Muslim who never invade nor thought about it is not a true Muslim (Hadith Sahih)

http://www.islamicbag.com/news-articles/reality-islam/item/2097-part2moeoffensivemuslimsinvade-en

 

-The Quran generic commandments to subjugate the whole world to Islam using the sword

http://www.islamicbag.com/news-articles/reality-islam/item/2101-part3genericcommandmentstosubjcatetheworld-en

 
 

To be continued ....

 
Under a fake cover of TAWHID cause, Muhammad started the invasion with hidden agenda of greed
 

Muhammadian wars was offensive not defensive part 4

 

Under a fake cover of TAWHID cause, Muhammad started the invasion with hidden agenda of greed

 

Part 3 of this article we saw the Quran generic commandments to subjugate the whole world to Islam using the sword and following is the link for that

http://www.islamicbag.com/news-articles/reality-islam/item/2101-part3genericcommandmentstosubjcatetheworld-en

 

Today we will provide evidence that Muhammad started the aggression to invade having a hidden agenda of greed

 

For example the hadith mentioned the first battle caused by Muhammad as following

 

Sahih al-Bukhari » Book of Military Expeditions led by the Prophet (pbuh) (Al-Maghaazi) » Hadith # 3949

Chapter: The Ghazwa of Al-‘Ushaira or Al-usaira

Narrated Abu 'Is-haq:

Once, while I was sitting beside Zaid bin Al-Arqam, he was asked, "How many Ghazwat did the Prophet undertake?" Zaid replied, "Nineteen." They said, "In how many Ghazwat did you join him?" He replied, "Seventeen." I asked, "Which of these was the first?" He replied, "Al-`Ashira or Al- `Ashiru."

 
 

http://sunnah.com/bukhari/64/1

 
 

Muhammad promoted invasion

 

we proved that the arabic word “GHAZA” coming from “GHAZOW” means invade

Let us see how Muhammad incited invasion of others in Quran and hadith

 
 

Check this hadith from Sahih Muslim

 

Sahih Muslim » The Book on Government » Hadith # 1895 b

Chapter: The virtue of helping the warrior who is fighting in the cause of Allah with mounts etc., and looking after his family in his absence

The above tradition has been narrated on the authority of Khalid al- Juhani who said

The Prophet of Allah (ﷺ) said: He who equips a warrior {arabic word is Ghazi meaning invader} in the way of Allah (is like one who dctually fights) aud he who looks after the family of a warrior in the way of Allah in fact participated in the battle.

 

http://sunnah.com/muslim/33/199

 

The same is in Bukhari and following is the link

http://sunnah.com/bukhari/56/59

 

and also Muhammad incited killing the people of the book and the pagans all together in part 3 link at the beginning of this article and also in part 2 and following is the link

http://www.islamicbag.com/news-articles/reality-islam/item/2097-part2moeoffensivemuslimsinvade-en

 
 

Muhammad house needed the invasion

We can very easily prove that from ahadith for example

 

Sahih al-Bukhari » Book of Military Expeditions led by the Prophet (pbuh) (Al-Maghaazi) » Hadith # 4242

 

Chapter: Ghazwa of Khaibar

Narrated `Aisha:

When Khaibar was conquered, we said, "Now we will eat our fill of dates!"

 

http://sunnah.com/bukhari/64/279

So after Khaibar the house of Muhammad got their enough of food specifically dates

We also find in Sirah Ibn Hisham (the earliest historical reference for Muhammad) that after Khaybar they got a lot of wheat and Muhammad started to distribute that on his own family

 

Arabic evidence

بعد الغزوات أمتلأت بيوتهم بالقمح المنهوب، فقد ورد فى السيرة النبوية لابن هشام :

"ذِكْرُ مَا أَعْطَى مُحَمَّدٌ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ نِسَاءَهُ مِنْ قَمْحِ خَيْبَرَ : قَسَمَ لَهُنَّ مِئَةَ وَسْقٍ وَثَمَانِينَ وَسْقًا ، وَلِفَاطِمَةَ بِنْتِ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ خَمْسَةً وَثَمَانِينَ وَسْقًا، وَلِأُسَامَةَ بْنِ زَيْدٍ أَرْبَعِينَ وَسْقًا ، وَلِلْمِقْدَادِ بْنِ الْأَسْوَدِ خَمْسَةَ عَشَرَ وَسْقًا ، وَلِأُمِّ رُمَيْثَةَ خَمْسَةَ أَوْسُقٍ . شَهِدَ عُثْمَانُ بْنُ عَفَّانَ وَعَبَّاسٌ . وَكَتَبَ" . 

أنظر السيرة النبوية لابن هشام -عبد الملك بن هشام بن أيوب الحميري -  ذكر المسير إلى خيبر في المحرم سنة سبع- عَهْدُ الرَّسُولِ إلَى نِسَائِهِ بِنَصِيبِهِنَّ فِي الْمَغَانِمِ – الجزء الثاني - [ ص: 353 ] - طبعة مؤسسة علوم القرآن .

http://www.islamweb.org/newlibrary/display_book.php?flag=1&bk_no=58&ID=1334

 
 

Muhammad ٍSahaba needed the invasion

And this is by the admission of the Sahaba himself and we find the following in Sahih Al Bukhari

 

Sahih al-Bukhari » Book of Jizyah and Mawaada'ah » Hadith

 

Chapter: Al-Jizya taken from the Dhimmi

Narrated Jubair bin Haiya:

`Umar sent the Muslims to the great countries to fight the pagans. When Al-Hurmuzan embraced Islam, `Umar said to him. "I would like to consult you regarding these countries which I intend to invade." Al-Hurmuzan said, "Yes, the example of these countries and their inhabitants who are the enemies. of the Muslims, is like a bird with a head, two wings and two legs; If one of its wings got broken, it would get up over its two legs, with one wing and the head; and if the other wing got broken, it would get up with two legs and a head, but if its head got destroyed, then the two legs, two wings and the head would become useless. The head stands for Khosrau, and one wing stands for Caesar and the other wing stands for Faris. So, order the Muslims to go towards Khosrau." So, `Umar sent us (to Khosrau) appointing An-Nu`man bin Muqrin as our commander. When we reached the land of the enemy, the representative of Khosrau came out with forty-thousand warriors, and an interpreter got up saying, "Let one of you talk to me!" Al-Mughira replied, "Ask whatever you wish." The other asked, "Who are you?" Al-Mughira replied, "We are some people from the Arabs; we led a hard, miserable, disastrous life: we used to suck the hides and the date stones from hunger; we used to wear clothes made up of fur of camels and hair of goats, and to worship trees and stones. While we were in this state, the Lord of the Heavens and the Earths, Elevated is His Remembrance and Majestic is His Highness, sent to us from among ourselves a Prophet whose father and mother are known to us. Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:-- "Whoever amongst us is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become your master." (Al-Mughira, then blamed An-Nu`man for delaying the attack and) An-Nu' man said to Al-Mughira, "If you had participated in a similar battle, in the company of Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) he would not have blamed you for waiting, nor would he have disgraced you. But I accompanied Allah's Apostle in many battles and it was his custom that if he did not fight early by daytime, he would wait till the wind had started blowing and the time for the prayer was due (i.e. after midday).

 

http://sunnah.com/bukhari/58/3

 

So basically the Sahaba was very needy and the prophet came and said we will fight everyone to worship one allah or pay Jizya

 
 

ِAnother ahadith that shows the Sahaba were in so anticipation for any merchandise or food are the following

Sahih Muslim » The Book of Prayer - Friday » Hadith # 863 d

 

Chapter: The verse: “And when they see some merchandise or some amusement they disperse headlong to it, and leave you standing”

 

Jabir b. Abdullah reported:

While the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) was delivering (a sermon) on Friday, a caravan of merchandise came to Medina. The Companions of the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) rushed towards it till only twelve persons were left with him including Abu Bakr and 'Umar; and it was at this occasion that this verse was revealed." And when they see merchandise or sport, they break away to it."

 

http://sunnah.com/muslim/7/50

 

Now Bukhari mentioned that this caravan was a caravan of food merchandise

 

Sahih al-Bukhari » Book of Friday Prayer » Hadith # 936

 

Chapter: If some people leave while the Imam during the Salat-ul-Jumu'ah

 

Narrated Jabir bin `Abdullah:

While we were praying (Jumua Khutba & prayer) with the Prophet (p.b.u.h), some camels loaded with food, arrived (from Sham). The people diverted their attention towards the camels (and left the mosque), and only twelve persons remained with the Prophet. So this verse was revealed: "But when they see Some bargain or some amusement, They disperse headlong to it, And leave you standing." (62.11)

 

So the Sahaba left the prayer and Muhammad giving a sermon and ran for food, that must say something

 

http://sunnah.com/bukhari/11/60

 
 

Also we find that Muhammad and his Sahaba in the early invasions they used to eat locusts showing how needy they were, we find this same hadith in both Bukhari and Muslim

 

Riyad as-Salihin » The Book of Miscellaneous ahadith of Significant Values » Hadith

 

The Book of Miscellaneous ahadith of Significant Values

'Abdullah bin Abu 'Aufa (May Allah be pleased with them) said:

We accompanied the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) in seven expeditions {Ghazawat meaming serval GHAZOW}, and we ate locusts.

 

[Al-Bukhari and Muslim].

 

http://sunnah.com/riyadussaliheen/19/26

http://sunnah.com/muslim/34/74

 
 
 
 

Also we find in the following hadith that they used to use palm trees for dates as a loan and he payed back after Banu Quraiza and Banu An- Nadir were conquered

 

Sahih al-Bukhari » Book of Military Expeditions led by the Prophet (pbuh) (Al-Maghaazi) » Hadith 4120

 

Chapter: The return of the Prophet (saws) from Ahzab and his going out to Bani Quraiza

 

Narrated Anas:

Some (of the Ansar) used to present date palm trees to the Prophet (ﷺ) till Banu Quraiza and Banu An- Nadir were conquered (then he returned to the people their date palms). My people ordered me to ask the Prophet (ﷺ) to return some or all the date palms they had given to him, but the Prophet (ﷺ) had given those trees to Um Aiman. On that, Um Aiman came and put the garment around my neck and said, "No, by Him except Whom none has the right to be worshipped, he will not return those trees to you as he (i.e. the Prophet (ﷺ) ) has given them to me." The Prophet (ﷺ) go said (to her), "Return those trees and I will give you so much (instead of them)." But she kept on refusing, saying, "No, by Allah," till he gave her ten times the number of her date palms.

 

http://sunnah.com/bukhari/64/164

 
 

So we say how Muhammad and his Sahaba were needy until they made invasions and became the dominating power in the Arabia

 

To be continued ....

 
To satisfy his friend Umar sexual desires Muhammad came with Surah 2:223

 

Muhammad the Corrupted postman who used Quran to please his followers - part 4

 

To satisfy his friend Umar sexual desires Muhammad came with  Surah 2:223

 

Part 3 when talked about Muhammad the corrupted postman who  asked Muslims to do “Saee” between two two places used to have idols on top of each to please his followers, to read part 3 follow the following link

 

http://www.islamicbag.com/quran-hadith/mohammed/item/2163-part3muhammadabusesafaandmarwa-en

 

On the same line we continue today to expose more of him being abusive to his own prophecy

Surah Al Baqara 2:223

Your wives are a place of sowing of seed for you, so come to your place of cultivation however you wish and put forth [righteousness] for yourselves. And fear Allah and know that you will meet Him. And give good tidings to the believers. (Sahih International)

Now this ayah symbolizes women as a field and men as farmers who saw their seeds from wherever they want, what an ugly language and what a disgraceful metaphor for women!!!

No wonder in another translation of this ayah it says “Your wives are a tilth for you”!

 

But this is not our subject for today, our subject today is the reasons of TANZEL for this crabby ayah, so let us head directly to that

 

Asbab Al-Nuzul by Al-Wahidi for Surah 2:223

 

The reasons of TANZEL is too long so I will take the part that takes about the motive behind why claimed Allah revealed this ayah

 

Muhammad ibn 'Abd al-Rahman al-Mutawwi'i informed us> Abu 'Amr ibn Hamdan> Abu 'Ali> Zuhayr> Yunus ibn Muhammad> Ya'qub al-Qummi> Ja'far> Sa'id ibn Jubayr> Ibn 'Abbas who said: “ 'Umar ibn al-Khattab went to the Messenger of Allah, Allah bless him and give him peace, and said to him: 'I have perished!' The Prophet exclaimed: 'And what is the reason of your peril?' He said: 'I turned over the carriage of my camel'.  {Meaning he mate with his wife from the back} He said: 'The Prophet did not answer him. But then this verse (Your women are a tilth for you (to cultivate) so go to your tilth as ye will) was revealed to the Messenger of Allah, Allah bless him and give him peace'. Meaning: penetrate your wives from the front and from the back, but avoid penetrating them in the anus or during their menstruation”.

 

http://www.altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=0&tTafsirNo=86&tSoraNo=2&tAyahNo=223&tDisplay=yes&Page=2&Size=1&LanguageId=2

 

And Tafsir Ibn Kathir in Arabic concurs the same but as usual the english translator for Ibn Kathir volunteered to skip this part from translation!

 

So Umar had a sexual intercourse with his wife using her rear regardless of where he placed his goods that is not the subject, the subject really is how Muhammad dealing with the acclaimed inspiration of the Quran and using it to establish himself as a person guarding the interests and desires of the party of followers who constitute his power and authority. And Surah 2:223 is an evidence for that.

So Muslims, Umar running screaming to the prophet of Islam that he will perish because he had sexual intercourse with her using her rear and he is concerned that he would go to hell because of that, so what was Muhammad response???? Muhammad saved his neck and made his action HALLAL by Surah 2:223

Is not Muhammad abusing the prophecy for his own good and to please his supporters?????

 

To be continued ..

The Quran generic commandments to subjugate the whole world to Islam using the sword

 

Muhammadian wars was offensive not defensive part 3

 

The Quran generic commandments to subjugate the whole world to Islam using the sword

 

Part 2 of this article we saw that it is obligatory for the Muslims to invade and this is the link for Part 2

http://www.islamicbag.com/news-articles/reality-islam/item/2097-part2moeoffensivemuslimsinvade-en

 

Please remember that when comparing between two different worldviews typically Islam versus Christianity we are comparing the generic commandments that followers of this religion today are obliged to follow, we are not comparing circumstantial directives and that what confuses the Muslim when he qoute from Old testament because he is not quoting generic commandments but circumstantial directives. And that is totally different from the general evil commandments that we will present now from the Quran

 

Islam prohibits peace with the enemy if weaker

Surah Muhammad 47:35

فَلَا تَهِنُواْ وَتَدۡعُوٓاْ إِلَى ٱلسَّلۡمِ وَأَنتُمُ ٱلۡأَعۡلَوۡنَ وَٱللَّهُ مَعَكُمۡ وَلَن يَتِرَكُمۡ أَعۡمَـٰلَكُمۡ

So do not weaken and call for peace while you are superior; and Allah is with you and will never deprive you of [the reward of] your deeds. (Sahih international)

We saw in part 1 that this Ayah abrogated Surah 8:61 for more about that refer to the linked article

http://www.islamicbag.com/news-articles/reality-islam/item/2093-part1muhammadoffensivewars-en

 

Surah Al Tawba 9:111

إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ ٱشۡتَرَىٰ مِنَ ٱلۡمُؤۡمِنِينَ أَنفُسَهُمۡ وَأَمۡوَٲلَهُم بِأَنَّ لَهُمُ ٱلۡجَنَّةَ‌ۚ يُقَـٰتِلُونَ فِى سَبِيلِ ٱللَّهِ فَيَقۡتُلُونَ وَيُقۡتَلُونَ‌ۖ

Indeed, Allah has purchased from the believers their lives and their properties [in exchange] for that they will have Paradise. They fight in the cause of Allah , so they kill and are killed.

So Muslims Allah slaved you only for one purpose to slaughter the infidel!

 

IslamicInvasion

Muslims must be harsh and non-smiling to the unbelievers

Surah Al Fath 48:29

مُّحَمَّدٌ۬ رَّسُولُ ٱللَّهِ‌ۚ وَٱلَّذِينَ مَعَهُ ۥۤ أَشِدَّآءُ عَلَى ٱلۡكُفَّارِ رُحَمَآءُ بَيۡنَہُمۡ‌ۖ تَرَٮٰهُمۡ رُكَّعً۬ا سُجَّدً۬ا يَبۡتَغُونَ فَضۡلاً۬ مِّنَ ٱللَّهِ وَرِضۡوَٲنً۬ا‌ۖ سِيمَاهُمۡ فِى وُجُوهِهِم مِّنۡ أَثَرِ ٱلسُّجُودِ‌ۚ ذَٲلِكَ مَثَلُهُمۡ فِى ٱلتَّوۡرَٮٰةِ‌ۚ وَمَثَلُهُمۡ فِى ٱلۡإِنجِيلِ كَزَرۡعٍ أَخۡرَجَ شَطۡـَٔهُ ۥ فَـَٔازَرَهُ ۥ فَٱسۡتَغۡلَظَ فَٱسۡتَوَىٰ عَلَىٰ سُوقِهِۦ يُعۡجِبُ ٱلزُّرَّاعَ لِيَغِيظَ بِہِمُ ٱلۡكُفَّارَ‌ۗ وَعَدَ ٱللَّهُ ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُواْ وَعَمِلُواْ ٱلصَّـٰلِحَـٰتِ مِنۡہُم مَّغۡفِرَةً۬ وَأَجۡرًا عَظِيمَۢا

 

Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah ; and those with him are forceful against the disbelievers, merciful among themselves. You see them bowing and prostrating [in prayer], seeking bounty from Allah and [His] pleasure. Their mark is on their faces from the trace of prostration. That is their description in the Torah. And their description in the Gospel is as a plant which produces its offshoots and strengthens them so they grow firm and stand upon their stalks, delighting the sowers - so that Allah may enrage by them the disbelievers. Allah has promised those who believe and do righteous deeds among them forgiveness and a great reward. (Sahih international)

So this Ayah explicitly admits that Muhammad and his followers are forceful against the disbelievers. If you forced someone to submit to your God, is this considered an invitation for mankind to love your God or hate him???? Doesn't  that make the Quran an invitation for the disbelievers to hate God?????

Let us for example check a portion of Tafsir for this ayah

 

Tafsir Ibn Kathir for Surah 48:29

 

This is the description of the believers; harsh with the disbelievers, merciful and kind to the believers, angry without smiling before the

disbelievers, smiling and beaming with pleasure before his believing brother.

 

Is not that called discrimination????

 

Generic commandments Ayah to subjugate the whole world to Islam by the sword

Surah Al Tawba 9:123

ـٰٓأَيُّہَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُواْ قَـٰتِلُواْ ٱلَّذِينَ يَلُونَكُم مِّنَ ٱلۡڪُفَّارِ وَلۡيَجِدُواْ فِيكُمۡ غِلۡظَةً۬‌ۚ وَٱعۡلَمُوٓاْ أَنَّ ٱللَّهَ مَعَ ٱلۡمُتَّقِينَ

 

O you who have believed, fight those adjacent to you of the disbelievers and let them find in you harshness. And know that Allah is with the righteous (Sahih International)

 

Read any Tafsir for this ayah, let us take couple of examples of those

 

Tafsir Al-Jalalayn for Surah 9:123

O you who believe, fight those of the disbelievers who are near to you, that is, the nearest, followed by the next nearest of them, and let them find harshness in you, that is, severity, in other words, be harsh with them, and know that God is with the pious, helping and granting [them] victory.

http://www.altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=0&tTafsirNo=74&tSoraNo=9&tAyahNo=123&tDisplay=yes&UserProfile=0&LanguageId=2

 

Tafsir Ibn Abbas for Surah 9:123

(O ye who believe!) in Muhammad (pbuh) and in the Qur'an (Fight those of the disbelievers who are near to you) the Banu Qurayzah, Banu'l-Nadir, Fadak and Khaybar, (and let them find harshness in you) toughness from you, (and know) O believers (that Allah is with those who keep their duty (unto Him)) Allah helps the believers: Muhammad (pbuh) and his Companions, by making them victorious over their enemies.

 

By the way those Jewish tributes are unitarians who believe in one God and there is not one historical document that proves that those did any harm or aggression to Muhammad and his followers!!

 

Tafsir Ibn Kathir for Surah 9:123

Allah commands the believers to fight the disbelievers, the closest in area to the Islamic state, then the farthest.

This is why the Messenger of Allah started fighting the idolators in the Arabian Peninsula. When he finished with them and Allah gave him control over Makkah, Al-Madinah, At-Ta'if, Yemen, Yamamah, Hajr, Khyber, Hadramawt and other Arab provinces, and the various Arab tribes entered Islam in large crowds, he then started fighting the People of the Scriptures.

He began preparations to fight the Romans who were the closest in area to the Arabian Peninsula, and as such, had the most right to be called to Islam, especially since they were from the People of the Scriptures. The Prophet marched until he reached Tabuk and went back because of the extreme hardship, little rain and little supplies.

This battle occurred on the ninth year after his Hijrah.

In the tenth year, the Messenger of Allah was busy with the Farewell Hajj. The Messenger died eighty-one days after he returned from that Hajj, Allah chose him for what He had prepared for him (in Paradise).

After his death, his executor, friend, and Khalifah, Abu Bakr As-Siddiq, may Allah be pleased with him, became the leader. At that time, the religion came under attack and would have been defeated, if it had not been for the fact that Allah gave the religion firmness through Abu

Bakr, who established its basis and made its foundations firm. He brought those who strayed from the religion back to it, and made those who reverted from Islam return. He took the Zakah from the evil people who did not want to pay it, and explained the truth to those who were unaware of it. On behalf of the Prophet, Abu Bakr delivered what he was entrusted with.

Then, he started preparing the Islamic armies to fight the Roman cross worshippers, and the Persian fire worshippers. By the blessing of his mission, Allah opened the lands for him and brought down Caesar and Kisra and those who obeyed them among the servants.

 

And thank you Ibn Kathir for the summarized history of bloody Islam!

 

So this ayah admits invasion, and admits increasing the circle of invasion by time

 

Surah Al Anfal 8:38-39

قُل لِّلَّذِينَ ڪَفَرُوٓاْ إِن يَنتَهُواْ يُغۡفَرۡ لَهُم مَّا قَدۡ سَلَفَ وَإِن يَعُودُواْ فَقَدۡ مَضَتۡ سُنَّتُ ٱلۡأَوَّلِينَ (٣٨) وَقَـٰتِلُوهُمۡ حَتَّىٰ لَا تَكُونَ فِتۡنَةٌ۬ وَيَڪُونَ ٱلدِّينُ ڪُلُّهُ ۥ لِلَّهِ‌ۚ فَإِنِ ٱنتَهَوۡاْ فَإِنَّ ٱللَّهَ بِمَا يَعۡمَلُونَ بَصِيرٌ۬ (٣٩) وَإِن تَوَلَّوۡاْ فَٱعۡلَمُوٓاْ أَنَّ ٱللَّهَ مَوۡلَٮٰكُمۡ‌ۚ نِعۡمَ ٱلۡمَوۡلَىٰ وَنِعۡمَ ٱلنَّصِيرُ

Say to those who have disbelieved [that] if they cease, what has previously occurred will be forgiven for them. But if they return [to hostility] - then the precedent of the former [rebellious] peoples has already taken place. And fight them until there is no fitnah and [until] the religion, all of it, is for Allah . And if they cease - then indeed, Allah is Seeing of what they do.

 

So if we apply the cause and the final goal methodology

What was the cause to fight those people? Because they have disbelieved

What is the final goal? Until there is no fitnah and the religion, all of it is for Allah!

Is not that generic and absolute commandment our muslims brother?????

Let us check Tafasir

 

Tafsir al-Jalalayn for Surah 8:39

And fight them until sedition idolatry is exists no more and religion is all for God alone none other being worshipped; then if they desist from unbelief surely God sees what they do and will requite them for it.

http://www.altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=0&tTafsirNo=74&tSoraNo=8&tAyahNo=39&tDisplay=yes&UserProfile=0&LanguageId=2

 

Tafsir Ibn Kathir for Surah 8:39

Ad-Dahhak reported that Ibn Abbas said about the

Ayah, (And fight them until there is no more Fitnah...),

"So that there is no more Shirk.''

Similar was said by Abu Al-Aliyah, Mujahid, Al-Hasan, Qatadah, Ar-Rabi bin Anas, As-Suddi, Muqatil bin Hayyan and Zayd bin Aslam.

Muhammad bin Ishaq said that he was informed from Az-Zuhri, from Urwah bin Az-Zubayr and other scholars that (until there is no more Fitnah), the Fitnah mentioned here means, until no Muslim is persecuted so that he abandons his religion.

Ad-Dahhak reported that Ibn Abbas said about Allah's statement,

(and the religion (worship) will all be for Allah alone).

"So that Tawhid is practiced in sincerity with Allah.''

Al-Hasan, Qatadah and Ibn Jurayj said, (and the religion will all be for Allah alone), "So that La ilaha illa-llah is proclaimed.''

Muhammad bin Ishaq also commented on this Ayah, "So that Tawhid is practiced in sincerity towards Allah, without Shirk, all the while shunning all rivals who (are being worshipped) besides Him.''

Abdur-Rahman bin Zayd bin Aslam said about, (and the religion will all be for Allah alone), "So that La ilaha illa-llah is proclaimed.''

Muhammad bin Ishaq also commented on this Ayah, "So that Tawhid is practiced in sincerity towards Allah, without Shirk, all the while shunning all rivals who (are being worshipped) besides Him.''

There is a Hadith collected in the Two Sahihs that testifies to this explanation. The Messenger of Allah said:

I was commanded to fight against the people until they proclaim, `There is no deity worthy of worship except Allah.' If and when they say it, they will preserve their blood and wealth from me, except for its right (Islamic penal code), and their reckoning is with Allah, the Exalted and Most Honored.

Also, in the Two Sahihs, it is recorded that Abu Musa Al-

Ashari said,

"The Messenger of Allah was asked about a man who fights because he is courageous, in prejudice with his people, or to show off. Which of these is for the cause of Allah?

He said, Whoever fights so that Allah's Word is the supreme, is in the cause of Allah, the Exalted and Most Honored.''

One last interesting and decisive aspect in this article is what Tafsir Al Qurtobi said about 8:39, or Al Qurtobi I had to do the translation to english myself but it worth

 

Tafsir Al Qurtobi for Surah 8:39

Allah said, “Fight them” is a commandment to fight and slay every polytheist in every place, some so this ayah as abrogating (meaning it abrogates others) and others said it is not abrogating ...

But the first opinion is the more reliable and it is a directive to fight and slay as an absolute (generic) commandment and it is not conditioned by the fact that the KOFFAR (the infidel) started the fight and the evidence of that Allah TAALLA said “religion is all for God alone” and the prophet (pbuh) said “ I was commanded to fight against the people until they proclaim, `There is no deity worthy of worship except Allah.'”

So this ayah inserts that the reason of starting the fight is “KOFFR” ( that the emeny is infidel) ... and the ultimate goal is removing the “KOFF” (eliminating infidelity)

 

Arabic reference

 

{39} وَقَاتِلُوهُمْ حَتَّى لَا تَكُونَ فِتْنَةٌ وَيَكُونَ الدِّينُ كُلُّهُ لِلَّهِ فَإِنِ انْتَهَوْا فَإِنَّ اللَّهَ بِمَا يَعْمَلُونَ بَصِيرٌ

قَوْله تَعَالَى : " وَقَاتِلُوهُمْ " أَمْر بِالْقِتَالِ لِكُلِّ مُشْرِك فِي كُلّ مَوْضِع , عَلَى مَنْ رَآهَا نَاسِخَةً . وَمَنْ رَآهَا غَيْرَ نَاسِخَة قَالَ : الْمَعْنَى قَاتِلُوا هَؤُلَاءِ الَّذِينَ قَالَ اللَّه فِيهِمْ : " فَإِنْ قَاتَلُوكُمْ " وَالْأَوَّل أَظْهَر , وَهُوَ أَمْر بِقِتَالٍ مُطْلَق لَا بِشَرْطِ أَنْ يَبْدَأَ الْكُفَّار . دَلِيل ذَلِكَ قَوْله تَعَالَى : " وَيَكُون الدِّين لِلَّهِ " , وَقَالَ عَلَيْهِ السَّلَام : ( أُمِرْت أَنْ أُقَاتِلَ النَّاسَ حَتَّى يَقُولُوا لَا إِلَهَ إِلَّا اللَّه ) . فَدَلَّتْ الْآيَة وَالْحَدِيث عَلَى أَنَّ سَبَب الْقِتَال هُوَ الْكُفْر , لِأَنَّهُ قَالَ : " حَتَّى لَا تَكُونَ فِتْنَة " أَيْ كُفْر , فَجَعَلَ الْغَايَة عَدَم الْكُفْر , وَهَذَا ظَاهِر قَالَ اِبْن عَبَّاس وَقَتَادَة وَالرَّبِيع وَالسُّدِّيّ وَغَيْرهمْ : الْفِتْنَة هُنَاكَ الشِّرْك وَمَا تَابَعَهُ مِنْ أَذَى الْمُؤْمِنِينَ . وَأَصْل الْفِتْنَة : الِاخْتِبَار وَالِامْتِحَان , مَأْخُوذ مِنْ فَتَنْت الْفِضَّة إِذَا أَدْخَلْتهَا فِي النَّار لِتَمِيزَ رَدِيئَهَا مِنْ جَيِّدهَا . وَسَيَأْتِي بَيَان مَحَامِلهَا إِنْ شَاءَ اللَّه تَعَالَى .

 

http://quran.al-islam.com/Page.aspx?pageid=221&BookID=14&Page=181

 

And that is why we say the concept of subjugating the whole world to Islam by the sword it is essential to the  Islamic belief system

 

And finally I invite you to watch this video and say how Muslims implant into the souls of their children the culture of death

To be continued ....

The Ayahs that Islamic Dawah use to present Islam as peaceful are abrogated

 

Muhammadian wars was offensive not defensive part 1

The Ayahs that Islamic Dawah use to present Islam as peaceful are abrogated

 

When we talk about terror and violence in Islam the first thing the Muslim apologist will do is to jump right away to OT violence, so to close that door is this: Muslim apologists here is an article about that, just click the following link

http://www.islamicbag.com/christian-basics/respond-to-your-question/item/2087-answeringotviolcanaanites-en

 

We will start a series of articles to show our Muslim brothers that the decisive and ultimate doctrine of the Quran is fight the whole world until all of it is subjugated to Islam and we will prove that based on:

1- The Sword ayahs in the Quran is the ultimate and superior doctrine, meanwhile the defensive and peaceful ayahs are abrogated

2- The follow of the historical events of Muhammad biography (based on Islamic Sirah and Hadith) and his wars that he triggered proves that Muhammad was mostly on the offense side

The Peaceful Ayahs that the Muslim Apologists always use

 

Surah Al Baqara 2:190

وَقَاتِلُوا فِي سَبِيلِ اللَّهِ الَّذِينَ يُقَاتِلُونَكُمْ وَلَا تَعْتَدُوا إِنَّ اللَّهَ لَا يُحِبُّ الْمُعْتَدِينَ

 

Fight in the way of Allah those who fight you but do not transgress. Indeed. Allah does not like transgressors (Sahih International)

 

According to Tabari Surah 2:190 abrogated by Surah 9:5

Arabic Reference

http://quran.al-islam.com/Page.aspx?pageid=221&BookID=13&Page=29

 

From Al Qurtobi in English for Surah 2:190

Then this iiyat was revealed, meaning that it is lawful for you to fight if the unbelievers fight you. So the iiyat is connected to the prior mention of l}ajj and entering houses by the back door. After this the Prophet fought those who fought him and refrained from those who refrained from fighting him until the iiyat in Surat at-

Tawba (9:5) was revealed, "Fight the idolaters," and this ayat was abrogated. This is the position of the majority of scholars.

 

but do not go beyond the limits.

This is a firm judgement. As for the apostates, the only options available concerning them are execution or repentance. The same applies to people involved in deviation and misguidance: the only options afforded them are execution or repentance. If someone conceals a false belief and then it appears in him, such as a zindfq, he should be killed and is not asked to repent. As for those who rebel against just rulers, they must be fought until they return to the truth.

Some people have said that this phrase means: "Do not go beyond the limits by fighting for other than the Face of Allah, for instance, out of fanaticism or to gain fame. Fight in the Way of Allah against those who fight you. Fight in support of the dzn so that Allah's Word is uppermost. It is said that it means: do not fight those who do not fight. In that case it would be abrogated by the command to fight all the unbelievers, and Allah knows best.

 

Arabic Reference

According to Al Qurtobi Surah 2:190 abrogated by Surah 9:5

http://quran.al-islam.com/Page.aspx?pageid=221&BookID=14&Page=29

 

From english Ibn Kathir for Surah 2:190

This was the first Ayah about fighting that was revealed in Al-Madinah. Ever since it was revealed, Allah's Messenger used to fight only those who fought him and avoid non-combatants. Later, Surah Bara'h was revealed.

Abdur-Rahman bin Zayd bin Aslam said similarly, then he said that;

this was later abrogated by the Ayah: (then kill them wherever you find them), (Surah 9:5).

 

Arabic Reference

Ibn Kathir said it is abrogated Surah 2:190 abrogated by Surah 9:5

http://quran.al-islam.com/Page.aspx?pageid=221&BookID=11&Page=29

 

Tafsir al-Jalalayn for Surah 2:190

After the Prophet (s) was prevented from [visiting] the House in the year of the battle of Hudaybiyya, he made a pact with the disbelievers that he would be allowed to return the following year, at which time they would vacate Mecca for three days. Having prepared to depart for the Visitation [‘umra], [he and] the believers were concerned that Quraysh would not keep to the agreement and instigate fighting. The Muslims were averse to becoming engaged in fighting while in a state of pilgrimage inviolability in the Sacred Enclosure [al-haram] and during the sacred months, and so the following was revealed: And fight in the way of God, to elevate His religion, with those who fight against you, the disbelievers, but aggress not, against them by initiating the fighting; God loves not the aggressors, the ones that overstep the bounds which God has set for them: this stipulation was abrogated by the verse of barā’a, ‘immunity’ [Q. 9:1], or by His saying [below]:

http://www.altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=0&tTafsirNo=74&tSoraNo=2&tAyahNo=190&tDisplay=yes&UserProfile=0&LanguageId=2

 

Surah Al Baqara 2:256

Let there be no compulsion in religion: Truth stands out clear from Error

We talked about this before and we found it was abrogated read this article

http://www.islamicbag.com/quran-hadith/qur-anic-studies/item/2028-nocompulsionagrogated-en

 

Surah Al Nahl 16:125

ادْعُ إِلَى سَبِيلِ رَبِّكَ بِالْحِكْمَةِ وَالْمَوْعِظَةِ الْحَسَنَةِ وَجَادِلْهُمْ بِالَّتِي هِيَ أَحْسَنُ إِنَّ رَبَّكَ هُوَ أَعْلَمُ بِمَنْ ضَلَّ عَنْ سَبِيلِهِ وَهُوَ أَعْلَمُ بِالْمُهْتَدِينَ

Invite (all) to the Way of thy Lord with wisdom and beautiful preaching; and argue with them in ways that are best and most gracious.

According to Al Qurtobi abrogated

http://quran.al-islam.com/Page.aspx?pageid=221&BookID=14&Page=281

 

 

Tafsir al-Jalalayn for Surah 16:125

Call, mankind, O Muhammad (s), to the way of your Lord, [to] His religion, with wisdom, [with] the Qur’ān, and fair exhortation, its [the Qur’ān’s] fair exhortations, or with gentle words, and dispute with them by way of that which, that is, by way of that [manner of] disputation which, is best, such as calling [them] to God by way of His signs and calling [them] to His definitive arguments. Truly your Lord knows best, that is, He is fully knowledgeable [of], those who stray from His way and He knows best those who are guided, and will requite them — this was [revealed] before the command to fight [them].

http://www.altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=0&tTafsirNo=74&tSoraNo=16&tAyahNo=125&tDisplay=yes&UserProfile=0&LanguageId=2

 

Surah Al Kahf 18:29

وَقُلِ الْحَقُّ مِنْ رَبِّكُمْ فَمَنْ شَاءَ فَلْيُؤْمِنْ وَمَنْ شَاءَ فَلْيَكْفُرْ

The truth is from your Lord": Let him who will believe, and let him who will, reject

 

But this Ayah did not deny the right of Muhammad and his followers to fight them and slay them whenever they are as in Sword Ayahs, and also it contradicts other ayahs where Islam is be forced and spread by the sword, read more about that in the following article

http://www.islamicbag.com/quran-hadith/qur-anic-studies/item/1692-en-islamandslaverypart2forcedslavery

 

Surah Al Anfal 8:61

وَإِنْ جَنَحُوا لِلسَّلْمِ فَاجْنَحْ لَهَا وَتَوَكَّلْ عَلَى اللَّهِ إِنَّهُ هُوَ السَّمِيعُ الْعَلِيمُ

But if the enemy incline towards peace, do thou (also) incline towards peace, and trust in Allah: for He is One that heareth and knoweth (all things).

Tafsir al-Jalalayn for Surah 8:61

And if they incline to peace (read silm or salm, meaning, ‘settlement’), then incline to it, and conclude a pact with them: Ibn ‘Abbās said, ‘This has been abrogated by the “sword verse” [Q. 9:5]’; Mujāhid said, ‘This [stipulation] applies exclusively in the context of the People of the Scripture, for it was revealed regarding the Banū Qurayza; and rely on God, put your trust in Him; truly He is the Hearer, of words, the Knower, of actions.

http://www.altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=0&tTafsirNo=74&tSoraNo=8&tAyahNo=61&tDisplay=yes&UserProfile=0&LanguageId=2

 

According to Tabari Surah 8:61 abrogated by Surah 9:5

Arabic Reference

http://quran.al-islam.com/Page.aspx?pageid=221&BookID=13&Page=184

 

According to Ibn Kathir Surah 8:61 abrogated by Surah 47:35

So you look into the english Ibn Kathir they practised TAQIYYA and did not translate that to english but the original Ibn Kathir in Arabic said that Ibn Abbas said that this ayah is abrogated with Surah 47:35

Arabic Reference

http://quran.al-islam.com/Page.aspx?pageid=221&BookID=14&Page=184

 

 

Surah Al Mayda 5:32

مِنۡ أَجۡلِ ذَٲلِكَ ڪَتَبۡنَا عَلَىٰ بَنِىٓ إِسۡرَٲٓءِيلَ أَنَّهُ ۥ مَن قَتَلَ نَفۡسَۢا بِغَيۡرِ نَفۡسٍ أَوۡ فَسَادٍ۬ فِى ٱلۡأَرۡضِ فَڪَأَنَّمَا قَتَلَ ٱلنَّاسَ جَمِيعً۬ا وَمَنۡ أَحۡيَاهَا فَڪَأَنَّمَآ أَحۡيَا ٱلنَّاسَ جَمِيعً۬ا‌ۚ وَلَقَدۡ جَآءَتۡهُمۡ رُسُلُنَا بِٱلۡبَيِّنَـٰتِ ثُمَّ إِنَّ كَثِيرً۬ا مِّنۡهُم بَعۡدَ ذَٲلِكَ فِى ٱلۡأَرۡضِ لَمُسۡرِفُونَ

Because of that, We decreed upon the Children of Israel that whoever kills a soul unless for a soul or for corruption [done] in the land - it is as if he had slain mankind entirely. And whoever saves one - it is as if he had saved mankind entirely. And our messengers had certainly come to them with clear proofs. Then indeed many of them, [even] after that, throughout the land, were transgressors.

You will find Muslims when they use this ayah they start from “whoever kills ..” and ignore the first part of the ayah “We decreed upon the Children of Israel whoever kills ...” so Muslims to be able to quote this one they have first to admit that they are the children of Israel! For more about that refer to the following link

http://www.islamicbag.com/news-articles/reality-islam/item/1613-islamcanneverbepeacfulreligion

 

Since we saw abrogation in this article a lot for info about the basis of abrogation in Quran read this article:

http://www.islamicbag.com/quran-hadith/qur-anic-studies/item/1980-quranselfcombustionpart1-abrogationallowsallahtochangehismind

 

So did you see the repeating pattern here? Peaceful and defensive ayahs are abrogated according to the mainstream early scholars and Tafsirs of Islam

We also saw that the sword ayahs in Surah 9 are superior to all the previous peaceful and defensive ayahs

 

To be continued ....